The Real 9/11 Truth Movement

New 9/11 Destruction Video Begs The Question: What Destroyed These Vehicles?

2010-09-09T05:33:00.000-07:00

Recently a new video taken on 9/11/2001 has surfaced on YouTube.com. The video shows lines of cars on a street that appear to have been destroyed by intense heat.

These images were taken from that video which I've included below. The date is 9/11/2001, before the collapse of World Trade Center 7.

The reporter says he's at "West Broadway and Barkley".

So what do you suppose caused those cars to end up like that? Are there any examples of buildings collapsing and incinerating all the vehicles around it?

This image shows the inside of a police car that was sitting on the street. As you can see the seats are entirely burnt down to practically nothing.

It's as if a huge fireball traveled down the street and incinerated everything in its path.

911 Truth Seekers Continue To Call Out The Fake 911 Truth Movement

2010-01-09T12:18:00.000-08:00

Image via Wikipedia

Each time I re-visit 911Blogger I notice more and more people calling out the Fake 911 Truth Movement. Here's an interesting exchange between Jon Gold and Robert Rice at 9/11 Blogger.com.

The exchange is in response to an interview of Lt. Anthony Shaffer by Alex Jones. Jon Gold, a known anti-controlled demolition and LIHOP specialist, starts us off.

Jon Gold Says

He essentially just dropped...

A bombshell.

And then...some credibility building by Gold for himself...

Jon Gold Says

I'm talking to him now...

About it. Non-Able Danger related... the thing that stood out to me was the fact that a Commissioner told him that each Commissioner was there to cover up for different people/organizations.

Two guesses of mine...

Lee Hamilton = Dick Cheney
Thomas Kean = George Bush

Now that's the Jon Gold I know. This guy relentlessly attempts to make himself appear important by name dropping and associating himself with 'the family members' to maintain 'credibility' within the movement. These associations actually hurt Jon Gold's credibility. especially considering that he's a known anti-controlled demolition LIHOPPER and he's voicing strong support for another extremely LIHIOP scenario presented by Anthony Shaffer.

To counter this I'm sure Gold will be posting a blog entry concerning "The Family Members" within 24 hrs.

Next we have an interesting response by Robert Rice. Rice echoes my own concerns about Able Danger and Anthony Shaffer.

Robert Rice says:

I cannot be the only one to recognize the significance of the very name of the operation, which was to follow and establish a capable or ABLE "danger" operating in the USA.

How can Shaffer have been completely removed or departmentalized from the true nature of what he was tasked with, given his credentials and sphere of operations..?

I see him as a type of spin doctor, with Alex Jones as part of a strange controlled opposition..

That it was left out of the 9/11 Report yes, is very significant - but what of the operation itself - was it not to ENSURE that there was a patsy "grid" in place, so as to allow for the successful execution of the 9/11 event itself?

So as a good guy, perhaps, as one who MAY have unwittingly been directly involved on the periphery, or even on the outer edges of the inner circle, at least for the LIHOP elements - of course he's going to try to use this book release to try to distance himself in history. However, given his credentials, what he was involved in and who he worked for, I have my doubts as to his true standing in relation to the 9/11 event and other similar such "black-ops" and psy-ops..

At the very least he knows way way WAY MORE than he's saying, so on that basis, I don't trust him, nor support him or his CIA vetted book release.

Also, why didn't AJ ask him any hardball questions?

Makes my spidey senses tingle, this story, that it may represent part of an elaborate controlled opposition spin to counter the movement of the 9/11 truth movement and there's Alex Jones eating it up and just loving it, as the somewhat narcissistic, megalomaniacal personality that he is.

Sorry, but I have to call these things the way I see them.

What's so disturbing about this, imho, is the fact that this guy was actually involved, in one way or another, in setting the stage for the 9/11 event, and controlling, to a large degree, the surrounding framework by which these hijackers were indentified, and then guarded until the nasty deed was done as per Zelikow's script.

So it's eery I think to hear an actual participant in 9/11 being interviewed by AJ and hailed as some sort of advocate for our movement for real and authentic 9/11 disclosure.

And his book will be edited by the CIA..

C'mon people, open your eyes.

Notice that RObert Rice actually apologizes to the 911Blogger community for questioning Lt. Anthony Shaffer and Able Danger. It is my view that discourse and thought control are the motivations behind the fake 911 Truth movement. I too felt the need to apologize to the 911Blogger community when asking the most common sense questions regarding so called 'bombshells' like Able Danger and Steve Atlen's bombshell 911 Book The Shell Game. This apology says so much about 911Blogger.com and how it's used to control discourse.

Later Jon Gold responds to Robert Rice and double checks that we all made a note that he's some kind of 'buddy' with Lt. Col. Anthony Shafer and Able Danger.

Jon Gold Says
A "spin doctor" would do something like this. Tony and I have chatted a lot, and he openly supports my efforts. From everything I can see, he is a good man. We have disagreements about the war, etc... but I don't doubt his sincerity.

Give me a break. So let me get this straight..."Tony" supports the anti-controlled demolition LIHOP efforts of Jon Gold? And Jon Gold is buddies with Tony Shaffer, someone who's testimony actually re-enforces the Islamaphobic Myth of 911?

Is that really that surprising to anyone?

Last I'll leave you with the obvious questions left on the table for Tony Able Danger Shaffer and one that blows his Al Queada baby right out of the water. What about the controlled demolition of WTC Building 7?

Robert Rice Says

Just as long as you realize that the very operation (Able Danger) that he was spearheading, was utilized to ENSURE that the 9/11 black-op/psy-op could be faciliated, in other words that he was directly involved, although it's possible his op COULD have been utilized for this purpose unbenownst to himself, in other words that he was so compartmentalized that the left hand didn't know what the right hand was doing.. Regardless he did serve to help set up and monitor the framework within which the crime of the century and mass murder, was perpetrated. But at most, this guy was only one step away from the perps themselves, and I don't mean just the hijackers.

What are his thoughts about the manner in which the twin towers and building 7 were destroyed? What does he think of that?

Gold and 911Blogger in general surely realize that Able Danger actually re-enforces the fake Islamaphobic explanation about the attcks on 9/11/2001. The real question is why must people apologize to the community when voicing these concerns?

USAPatriot Calls Out Colleen Rowley And Other Soft 9/11 Truthers

2009-10-24T06:56:00.001-07:00

Image via Wikipedia

I was always taken back at how some prominent 9/11 Truth supporters like Colleen Rowley and Ray McGoven refuse to talk about the obvious Controlled Demolition of the World Trade Center Complex. Colleen Rowley is an ex-FBI agent turned whistle-blower and Ray McGovern is an ex-CIA guy turned whistle-blower. Both think we need a new investigation into the attacks on 9/11 but both refuse to discuss the obvious elephant in the room, that the WTC complex was demolished by controlled demolition and the phony story about 19 Muslim Hijackers just does not add up.

Well a www.911blogger.com user by the name of USAPatriot put my feelings into words better then I could have. Here is what USAPatriot has to say about soft Truthers like Colleen Rowley and Ray McGovern who refuse to follow the truth where ever it may lead.

The quote below is a response to the video about Colleen Rowley which I've included after the quote.

http://911blogger.com/node/21696#comment-220195

Great.

Afterwards, a few of us from the dc911truth group approached Rowley to ask her where she stood on 9/11 (no camera, unfortunately). She would only go so far as to say we needed a new investigation, that she had signed the petition for it, and she supported the NYC CAN initiative. (She also mentioned Jon Gold…in a good way.)

However, when asked about Richard Gage’s work, the nanothermite paper, and the scientific basis for controlled demolitions, she tensed up, saying she wasn’t a scientist, didn’t have the knowledge, and would need an advanced degree to understand the theories. She held firm and was clearly unwilling to discuss it further.

That was very discouraging. For whatever reason, she would not (publicly) veer from the official script of al Qaeda, the 19 hijackers, Moussaoui and the FBI lapses.

Ray McGovern had the same response. He said he’s looked at the scientific evidence but isn’t convinced that it’s strong enough to support controlled demolitions. Including Building 7, presumably.

This, after a speech about moral courage and the duty to be informed.

It leaves us wondering why these “truthtellers” and “whistleblowers” even bother with events like this. They garner our admiration for having the courage to speak out; they urge us to do likewise. Yet when we do, when many of us risk our own careers and reputations to follow the truth regardless of where it leads, they refuse to go out on that limb with us. Why?

“Unanswered questions” is safe. Saying we need a new investigation is safe. But unless these public figures move beyond that and start using their soapboxes to challenge the official story, with more courage and conviction, nothing will happen. The 9/11 Truth movement will remain stagnant, divided, demoralized -- and contained.

Do they know something that we don’t? - USAPatriot

This is the video that USAPatriot is referring to:

US Helps Murder 40 Innocent Iranian People?

2009-10-19T09:06:00.001-07:00

A bomb killed 41 Iranians today. The group who claimed responsibility was earlier reported to be receiving CIA funding and weapons support. The group Jundullah has allegedly taken responsibility for the attacks that killed 41 innocent people in Iran.

Iran says they have evidence that the US, British and Pakistani government are involved with the group responsible. Is there proof? It seems so.

Bush Gave The Green Light On CIA Covert Actions To Destabilize Iran In 2007

In 2007 the Telegraph reported that George Bush and the United States had given the green light for covert operations in Iran. The goal? To destabilize Iran and bring about regime change.

The directive from former President Bush allows the CIA to conduct a non-lethal campaign to destabilize Iran. The 2007 Telegraph article also states:

"However, the CIA is giving arms-length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Iran from bases in Pakistan."

source: Telegraph - Bush sanctions 'black ops' against Iran

Although the CIA is not allowed to conduct it's own lethal actions against Iranians, they are allowed to fund and provide weapons to Jundullah. I guess providing weapons to terrorist groups does not constitute 'lethal actions'. Funny how that works.

Well, today a terrorist group bombed an Iranian military office resulting in the killing of over 40 innocent people. The group that claimed responsibility was "Jundallah" translated into "Soldiers of God".

As I've written about many times, the United States routinely assassinates Pakistani militants in secret assasination operations involving un-manned aerial vehicles and missiles. Is this terrorist attack another example of the United States secretly assassinating alleged enemies of the US and taking out civilians in the process? Is this another example of our government gone mad? Killing and murdering people with no evidence or public accountability?

Is this just more business as usual? Is my Empire REALLY just killing people in secret with no evidence or accountability?

Source: Iran: U.S., Britain, Pakistan linked to militants

911bogger.com Bans, Censors, Restricts Discussion About 9/11 Attacks

2009-10-13T06:38:00.000-07:00

9/11 Truth websites like www.911blogger.com and www.truthaction.org have been banning people, locking forum discussions, and restricting the dialog regarding the 9/11 Attacks. Literally censoring it's users in secret.

I was banned from www.911blogger.com and www.TruthAction.org with no warning, no reason given and no response to my requests for comment. As far as I can tell I was moderated for arguing with Jon Gold about a $100,000 money he alleges came from a Pakistani ISI General.

As a webmaster, I helped YT aka Cosmo of www.TruthAction.org set the site up along with the discussion forum. With no explanation, I was banned from that very site I helped launch. As far as I can tell I was banned when I posted a discussion about a 9/11 Truth personality named "Danse" who leveled some heavy accusations against the website WTCDemolition.com/Blog. The discussion was locked, then deleted and I was banned. No reason or replies to my request for comment.

It seems that my association with the website WTCDemolition.com was also a motivational factor behind my banning on both sites.

My Banning At www.911Blogger.com

As far as I can tell, my banning was set in motion when I wrote an article and debated with Jon Gold about an alleged $100K money transfer by OMar Saeed Sheih. This was allegedly authorized by a General Mahmood, Genreal of the ISI at the time of 9/11/2001. The article I posted to www.911blogger.com titled:

Omar Saeed Sheikh Disinfo Goose Chase
http://www.911blogger.com/node/5945

Soon after I posted my article to 911Blogger.com, a response blog was issue by a www.911blogger.com user pdevlinbuckley. This article decided to use my full name and location and accused me of being dumb and irrational and insinuating that I'm accusing 'The Family Members' of spreading disinformation. That article is here:

9/11 Press For Truth Accused of Spreading Disinformation
http://www.911blogger.com/node/6083

This article by www.911blogger.com user pdevlinbuckley finds it necessary to point out my full name and affiliation with PA 911 Visibility, a group that I met with one time. Jon Gold was present and I met him in Philadelphia along with about 10 others. In my initial article Gold pointed out my name so I'm assuming that's where PDEVILINBUCKLEY got my full name.

As far as I know, it's a known and respected blogger tradition. If a user does not post with their full name you don't refer to them by it. In my opinion, I'm was being intimidated by www.911blogger.com and it's users. Even after multiple requests to remove my full name from these articles, it remains to this day. There are multiple re-postings of this article on the internet with my full name and insinuations that I am accusing 'The Family Members' of spreading disinformation.

I was eventually placed in a 'moderation queue' at www.911blogger.com and eventually banned from the website entirely. No reason, no warning and no explanation has been given. My request to remove my full name was responded to but never was taken down.

I believe what ultimately got me 100% banned from 911blogger.com was my expressed anger with the way in which www.911blogger.com allowed Bill Douglas, another 9/11blogger.com user, to market the book "The Shell Game" to the 911blogger.com community. In a gross attempt to shove "The Shell Game" down the throats of the 911 Truth community, Bill Douglas made an ass of himself. www.911Blogger.com allowed him to treat it's users in a way I found disturbing.

As far as I know, it was decided that I should not be able to participate at 911Blogger.com because of these issues.

My Banning At TruthAction.org

I met Cosmo / YT over at www.GNN.TV around 2005 / 2006. After working together on an article about GNN.TV and it's founders (IS GNN A PSYOP?), I helped him set up the www.TruthAction.org website and online discussion forum.

I did not participate in the forum until months or even a year after I had helped him set up the site. I left the project because I didn't feel www.TruthAction.org was a project I could see myself spending a lot of time with. At the time I was also having my doubts about Alex Jones and the tactics he used. YT / Cosmo seemed to be a huge fan of Alex Jones, something I couldn't get used to. He would often get pumped up like Alex Jones ranting about the NWO or 9/11 like Alex does on his radio show. It wasn't my style and I didn't have the time.

I eventually decided to post to the forum after an attack by Danse, a known 911 Truth personality, on the users of WTCDemolition.com. "Danse" posted this to WTC Demolition website:

"Something tells me that if i quoted Bakunin on this score I'd be much more well received;

BAKUNYIN, MIKHYL. 19th century Russian revolutionary.

"Marx is a Jew and is surrounded by a crowd of little, more or less intelligent, scheming, agile, speculating Jews, just as Jews are everywhere, commercial and banking agents, writers, politicians, correspondents for newspapers of all shades; in short, literary brokers, just as they are financial brokers, with one foot in the bank and the other in the socialist movement, and their arses sitting upon the German press. They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it.

Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, Marx feels an instinctive inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance? Ho ho! The communism of Marx seeks a strong state centralization, and where this exists there must inevitably exist a state central bank, and where this exists, there the parasitic Jewish nation, which speculates upon the labor of the people, will always find the means for its existence...

In reality, this would be for the proletariat a barrack regime, under which the workingmen and the working closely and intimately connected with one another, regarless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well - this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschil. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, women, converted into a uniform mass, would rise, fall asleep, work and live at the beat of the drum; the privilege of ruling would be in the hands of the skilled and the learned, with a wide scope left for profitable crooked deals carried on by the Jews, who would be attracted by the enormous extension of the international speculations of the national banks... (PolÃ©mique contres les Juifs)

Bakunin also disliked niggers."

---------- Danse

The idea that "Zionism" was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001 is ridiculous as the idea that "Islam" was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001. But that is not to say that either topic is 'off limits' when investigating this crime.

Danse would eventually reply back to me with:

"JPass, fuck off nigger." - Danse

And later with:
"LOL. JPass, you can't take a joke. Would you prefer "Kike?"Â Write it down in your little book. " - Danse

Finally, after the booze wears off, he comes up with a reasonable concern:

"Call it Zionism or Jew control, I see little difference in terms of the content of this blog; I see a fishing expedition to find Jewish surnames. Â "Negro" or "nigger", it's still bigotry. - Danse

Danse is scared that people focus too much on Jews and I second that fear. But prove your case please. Don't just throw out attacks and then run away and ban users wishing to defend themselves.

Apparently, this is the point he was trying to get through with the insinuations that I hate Jews and probably blacks. I do believe that the website www.wtcdemolition.com/blog focuses on the "Israeli" angle more then others I frequent. With this comes the term "Zionism" and even discussion of Jews.

As someone concerned about these issues and how I'm perceived by my community, I've called out questionable material on many occasions at WTCDemolition.com. The material is removed and the community agrees that hate towards any group will not be tolerated at WTCDemolition.com/blog.

If people like Danse and Jon Gold and others wish to label 911 Truth Activists as Jew Haters or any other derogatory label, they should publish their case against people like Gretavo and WTCDemolition.com. Publicly present a case and stop moderating comments and discussion in secret to support their argument.

In conclusion, this is only a snapshot of my experience. There are a handful of self appointed 9/11 Truth moderators and / or bullies censoring speech at www.911blogger.com and elsewhere. If moderators can secretly ban and moderate discussions there will never be an atmosphere of trust in the 9/11 Truth movement.

Is GNN A PSYOP?

2009-10-09T10:07:00.000-07:00

As a contributor to this article I thought I should post it for those interested. The original was posted to GNN.TV but has since been deleted. I've added a few images to spruce it upa bit. - TRTM

IS GNN A PSYOP

These are the results of an independent investigation into GNN by about four former site members, including myself. It was originally posted at GNN itself, but I'm re-posting it here because it needs a new home in light of my decision to delete my account at GNN. Since its original writing, it has been edited to include new information, as well as edited for clarity in certain parts. I hope you all enjoy the read, and even if you don’t accept my thesis, at the very least I’m sure you’ll find this information intriguing. It will also likely bring significantly more traffic to this message board than normal; hopefully nobody minds.

My primary thesis is this: Guerrilla News Network is an American Intelligence disinfo operation designed to attract young political dissidents, draw them into the community, document their beliefs, and moderate their opinions. This thesis is not merely a hunch of mine, and I will now delve into the primary evidence which suggests collusion between GNN and the American intelligence community.

1. Anthony Lappe' and the USIA

Image via Wikipedia

Anthony Lappe is one of the four people who own and operate GNN, and is the website's editor and primary contributor; the other three owners are Stephen Marshall, Josh Shore, and Ian Inaba. Anthony is the son of the (moderately popular) American leftist writer Frances Moore Lappe, who - together with her daughter - operates the Small Planet Institute. The Institute has acknowledged that it has received funding for book tours from Heifer International, the WK Kellogg Foundation, The Sunflower Fund and Sustainable Table. It's also worth noting that the Small Planet Institute's primary sources of funding, in terms of day-to-day operations, are not publicly disclosed on their website, not unlike GNN's primary sources of funding are not publicly disclosed. Keep all of this in mind, because it will be important later.

In any case, Anthony shares a similar moderate-left worldview to his mother, and wound up in the same type of business: producing and distributing moderate-left propaganda. But Anthony has had other, slightly different (but also largely similar) jobs before GNN; particularly, "training" Palestinian reporters on behalf of the United States Government. Anthony's bio on GNN explicitly states that "in 1996, he received two grants from the U.S. government to help train reporters from the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation in the West Bank". Under what circumstances did this "training" occur? Well, the Palestinian Broadcasting Corporation (PBC), while technically a part of the Palestinian Authority, receives part of its funding from the US Government. Complaints about pro-jihadi propaganda in the PBC's television programs prompted American lawmakers to cut the station's funds in the mid-1990's. According to this wire report from the time:

In 1995 Palestinian Authority Chairman Yasser Arafat changed the structure to force the directors to report directly to him. That's when the United State Information Agency cut off direct funding for the station and decided to support and train individual journalists, including many who work for the PBC.

But in 1997 the USIA decided to try again, providing more than $200,000 of satellite-receiving equipment after the PBC agreed to broadcast seven hours of Worldnet and Voice of America programming on American policy, society and culture.

So what is this USIA which sought to strong-arm the Palestinians into broadcasting American propaganda over their airwaves? According to Wikipedia, The United States Information Agency (USIA), which existed from 1953 to 1999, was a United States agency devoted to "public diplomacy." The term public diplomacy (q.v.) is closely related to the word "propaganda," possibly synonymous with it depending on how the latter word is defined. So, the USIA was an American propaganda agency which existed from the early 1950's until 1999, when it was absorbed into the US State Department. I think that this quote, from one of the agency's former directors, articulates the USIA's role quite well:

USIA’s combined informational resources not only provide the only complete and unedited articulation of official U.S. policy abroad, they also enable us to shape and influence the overseas environments in which those policies are considered. – USIA Director Joseph Duffey, 1996 Budget Hearings

Anthony Lappe's Islamophonbic combic book "Shooting War" Image by stevegarfield via Flickr

The USIA's target audience, explains California State University professor and propaganda expert Nancy Snow, "is upper class business and professional elites who are often themselves agents of the propaganda system. The American majority, or remaining 80-90 percent, assume the role of "the bewildered herd". They are expected to go with the flow and not trouble themselves with political and economic decision making. Compliance of the herd is achieved because it forms the target audience of the commercial mass media through tabloid news, professional sports and popular television." It is worth noting that GNN's target audience is largely the same demographic, albeit younger; upper- and upper-middle class educated youths, particularly college students. The "upper class business and professional elites" of tomorrow.

With the USIA's unmistakable role as a propaganda agency for the US Government firmly established in our minds, is it not noteworthy - and indeed alarming - that Anthony Lappe worked for the agency in Palestine? Some of the aforementioned issues will be covered further in the next topic.

2. GNN and the Ford Foundation
While one might hope for transparent financial information from an allegedly "guerrilla" news network, GNN's owners have been disturbingly mute on the venture's finances, only ceding certain points when confronted about them. One such point is the fact that, as Stephen Marshall and Anthony Lappe have previously acknowledged, GNN has received grants from several non-profit foundations, including the Ford Foundation. The Ford Foundation has had numerous documented links to the CIA, and even the Wikipedia article on it touches on this fact,
noting that "certain critics such as former Binghamton University professor James Petras have criticized the Foundation for alleged links with the CIA. Petras has accused the Foundation of being a CIA front, citing former Foundation president Richard Bissell's relationship with DCI Allen Dulles and involvement with the Marshall Plan during the 1950s. Petras further denounces the Ford Foundation for funding what he terms "anti-leftist" human rights groups that "...do not participate in anti-globalization and anti-neoliberal mass actions.""

This type of intelligence/foundation collusion is not at all uncommon, however; as Petras himself noted in his work The Ford Foundation and the CIA: A documented case of philanthropic collaboration with the Secret Police, "the CIA uses philanthropic foundations as the most effective conduit to channel large sums of money to Agency projects without alerting the recipients to their source. From the early 1950s to the present the CIA’s intrusion into the foundation field was and is huge. A U.S. Congressional investigation in 1976 revealed that nearly 50% of the 700 grants in the field of international activities by the principal foundations were funded by the CIA (Who Paid the Piper? The CIA and the Cultural Cold War, Frances Stonor Saunders, Granta Books, 1999, pp. 134-135). The CIA considers foundations such as Ford "the best and most plausible kind of funding cover" (Ibid, p. 135). The collaboration of respectable and prestigious foundations, according to one former CIA operative, allowed the Agency to fund "a seemingly limitless range of covert action programs affecting youth groups, labor unions, universities, publishing houses and other private institutions" (p. 135). The latter included "human rights" groups beginning in the 1950s to the present. One of the most important "private foundations" collaborating with the CIA over a significant span of time in major projects in the cultural Cold War is the Ford Foundation."

The Ford Foundation specifically allocated $62,650 to the post-production costs of the GNN documentary American Blackout. This fact raises some obvious red flags; is a CIA-linked foundation really the type of people who should be funding movies about voting, particularly given the CIA's less-than-stellar respect for democracy around the globe? Further, could American Blackout have been changed in any way as a result of this funding, like some CIA-funded films have been in the past?

Recall that the Small Planet Institute, mentioned at the beginning of this article, also receives (seemingly all?) of its funding from non-profit foundations similar to Ford, as does GNN. So, taking into account that one of GNN's owners has worked for the US Government’s propaganda agency before, and that GNN has received funding from a foundation that has worked as a covert funding source for US Government propaganda before, I don't think it's at all unfair to suspect that we may be on to something here in terms of GNN being, to at least a certain
degree, a Psy-Op.

3. Stephen Marshall and Voice of Free Nigeria
GNN co-founder Stephen Marshall is the son of a wealthy Canadian industrialist, Jeffrey Marshall, who ran the family steel business (aptly named “Marshall Steel”) until he was fired in the midst of a hostile corporate takeover in 1992. Being the son of such a wealthy man afforded Stephen the opportunity to attend Lower Canada College, one of the most prestigious schools in Canada and a veritable daycare for the children of elites, who will essentially have found their way into one “old boys’ club” or another by the time they graduate at age eighteen. Another GNN co-founder, Josh Shore, also attended the school as a boy, though he and Stephen claim that they did not know each other in their formative years. Stephen continued his education at Lakefield College School, where he claims to have studied alongside “various members of European and Middle Eastern royalty including the Prince of Wales”. Going on to attend Queen’s University, Stephen’s life looked to be on the inside track to financial and social success, but several things happened along the way, some of which may not be what they initially seem. According to Globe and Mail writer Sarah Hampson, "in 1995, [Stephen] travelled to the Arizona desert, where a group of channellers put him in touch with some aliens from another planet who told him he would manifest a global television network". The “official” narrative of this incident and the years immediately thereafter is that, being an overly-ambitious young man, Stephen overstepped his bounds, got involved with drugs, and made some monetary errors; not a particularly compelling story, and surely one with which many people can relate. The first unique part of this story is the amount of money involved; backed by a 1.5 million-dollar investment from childhood friend and Cara Operations Ltd heiress Holiday Phelan, Stephen set off for the world in an effort to make the type of music video- inspired documentaries that would eventually lead to the creation of GNN. It’s worth noting that one doesn’t make childhood friends like the heiress to the Cara Foods fortune by attending an under-funded public school. That said, within a relatively short period of time, the money had all but vanished, the works it had funded had not taken off, and Stephen found himself alone in Cuba without any identification (having ripped it all up in a “moment of complete erasure”).

Contacting his father (who promptly wired him some cash), Stephen eventually found his way back to the wealthy West, where – after still more traveling – he was allegedly contacted by a Nigerian peace activist requesting his help in overthrowing the Nigerian dictator Sani Abacha. Why would a peace activist seek out an allegedly drug-plagued young man with transcendental experiences involving hallucinations about aliens to overthrow a military dictator on the other side of the world? Apparently, he liked Channel Zero and hoped that Stephen could help him make something just as good, but with a Nigerian audience in mind. Stephen claims to have agreed to help this Nigerian activist because he felt that, particularly after the execution of Ken Saro-Wiwa, the best way to help the Nigerian people was to overthrow Abacha.

Ken Saro-Wiwa, for the uninitiated, was the leader of a nonviolent Ogoni movement against the catastrophic environmental destruction associated with Shell’s oil extraction operations in the Niger Delta. After being framed for the murder of four Ogoni elders, Saro-Wiwa and eight other members of his political action group were executed. All of this occurred amidst virtual silence from both Shell Corporation and the United States Government. Thus (and allegedly with funding from Stephen himself) was born the radio station Voice of Free Nigeria (VOFN), whose function was to broadcast anti-Abacha propaganda into Nigeria. While being confronted about the dubious nature of the radio station, Stephen initially stated: “it’s worth noting, that when the Abacha regime discovered the broadcast, they said it was a CIA operation”.

However, after reading the first draft of this very investigation, Stephen downplayed that remark, saying: “when I saw [Nigerian democracy activist] Tunde Okorodudu in Oakland five years ago he had a newspaper clipping from 1998 that referenced the various pirate radio operations involved in trying to bring hope to the people, and that one of them, VoFN, was described by a government official as possibly a CIA operation, or something. that’s it.” A minor change in tune, to say the least. Assuming the Nigerians did indeed suspect VOFN was a CIA front as was initially alleged, we should recall that Washington has a history of tolerating and aiding military dictatorships that keep their domestic population under control and their markets open to Western penetration, both of which Abacha had essentially done, particularly during the aforementioned Saro-Wiwa episode.

This compliance to Western expectations makes one wonder why Abacha would have suspected that the Americans were conspiring against him, and begs the question as to when the Washington/Abacha relationship may have taken a turn for the worse. While documentation regarding the US-Nigerian relationship is hardly plentiful, we can go back as far as September 1997 (approximately five months after Stephen started working on Voice of Free Nigeria) to find one widely-reported manifestation of the friction between the two countries. According to Nigerian newspaper reports, armed policemen from the Lagos State anti-robbery squad also known as Operation Sweep … stopped a send-off party organized by human rights and pro-democracy groups for United States ambassador to Nigeria, Walter Carrington.

Apparently, the send-off party was shifted from its original venue after police sealed off all roads leading to the place. The party moved to a nearby house, of another opposition member Chief Ayo Adebanjo, but police appeared after Chief Bola Ige had said the opening prayers and Senator Abraham Adesanya, acting chairman of the opposition NADECO group, was in the middle of his farewell speech for Carrington. The police snatched the microphone from him and pointed guns at those present. The Nigerian government later issued an unconvincing apology for the incident, but the damage was done, and it was clear that Abacha was trying to mark his territory. Less than a year later, Abacha suddenly dropped dead under questionable circumstances, and was promptly buried on the same day; no autopsy was ever performed. The official reason given for his death was heart attack, but most Nigerians suspect either assassination or poisoning; “many,” according to his Wikipedia page, suspect he “died due to a Burantashi overdose”. Needless to say, Voice of Free Nigeria stopped broadcasting before the end of 1998, the raison d’etre of the station having been, in one way or another, accomplished.

But questions obviously remain; does the narrative we’ve been fed really make sense? Hardly. The sudden appearance of a mysterious Nigerian “activist” with an idea for an anti-Abacha radio station at a time when the relationship between Abacha and the US Government was deteriorating is highly questionable, as is the chronology of Stephen’s story up to that point. The son of a plutocrat, graduate of multiple elite schools and friend to other young heirs wealthy enough to front him $1.5 million, we are led to believe, indulged in psychotropic substances and followed the proverbial white rabbit to a communion with imagined aliens in the Arizona desert and – eventually – a kind of spiritual reawakening in Cuba, only to return to North America and be asked by a Nigerian peace activist to start a rebel radio station in Africa, and then continue on to start up a supposedly “dissident” news website alongside several other young elites, one of whom (Anthony Lappe) also partook in a foreign media operation that was linked to American intelligence. The entire story is so utterly ridiculous as to beg dismissal.

Wish though I may that anybody had a life so intriguing, it sounds to me more like “what a spy tells a civilian: a cover story, a legend” (Daniel Hopsicker, Welcome to Terrorland, p. 109). By crafting such an elaborate and bizarre back story, one could easily present such serendipitous moments as the meeting that led to VOFN as either believable or likely. As a simple exercise in rationality, I would urge the reader to ask himself or herself how many people they know who’ve studied at the best schools in their country, engaged in a years-long drug binge involving visions of aliens, and proceeded to start up a rebel radio station on the other side of the planet.

Needless to say, calling such a series of events “unlikely” would be an understatement. What is likely, on the other hand, is that what occurred during Stephen’s apparent travels was something altogether quite different, as were – most likely – the situations under which he became involved with VOFN and GNN.

4. Ian Inaba and the Israeli Connection
The fourth and final GNN partner (and the one who has passed largely without mention thus far) is Ian Inaba. Ian had - as seems to be the trend among GNN owners - a well-off upbringing, graduating from the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania, and quickly landing a spot as an investment banker at the San Francisco financial group Robertson Stephens & Co., staying on until 1996, when he left to work for a large Israeli corporation, Check Point Technologies. Last year, Check Point posted half a billion dollars of revenue; it’s one of the most well-known Israeli technology corporations, largely due to its popular firewall software. The company was founded (and has since been run) by an enigmatic young Israeli man named Gil Shwed. According to Fortune magazine, in 1986 Shwed, just 18 years old, joined the supersecret electronic intelligence arm of the Israeli Defense Forces called Unit 8200. His job most likely was to string together military computer networks in a way that would allow some users access to confidential materials while denying access to others.

When he left the service in 1990, Shwed walked off with the idea that would define his career and make him one of the youngest members of FORBES' billionaires list. Ian’s role at Check Point, according to his profile on GNN version 1 (cached here), was as the director of corporate development … where he headed the company's investment and acquisitions activities. This seems like a remarkably important job for such a young and relatively inexperienced person, especially when one takes into account that the firm in question is an Israeli intelligence- connected technology giant. While it’s unclear which “acquisitions” Ian oversaw during his time at Check Point, the company caught newspaper headlines earlier this year under rather dubious circumstances; namely, according to the Washington Post, by trying to buy the Maryland software security firm Sourcefire, which does business with Defense Department agencies. Not surprisingly, Check Point's proposed $225 million purchase of Laurel-based Sourcefire raised red flags with government cybersecurity officials … Check Point was built by Gil Shwed, whom Forbes magazine has described as an Israeli billionaire who served in the electronic intelligence arm of the Israeli Defense Forces.

By contrast, the firm that Check Point was attempting to buy out, Sourcefire, has deep roots in the National Security Agency. Its founder and chief technology officer, Martin Roesch, has served as an NSA contractor. Its vice president of engineering, Tom Ashoff, developed software for the secretive spy agency. After it became obvious that certain entrenched interests in the American security establishment didn’t want to let an Israeli intelligence-connected firm acquire an American intelligence-connected firm, Check Point quietly withdrew its buy-out plans. In the same vein as Anthony Lappe and Stephen Marshall, then, we can regard Ian Inaba as a wealthy elite with connections to state intelligence agencies; in his case, Israeli military intelligence. Hardly a “guerrilla” former employer, if indeed there were such a thing.

5. Understanding Propaganda
There is an astounding ignorance about the nature of propaganda and psychological operations (“Psy-Ops”) in our society today. Those without an education in the matter may wonder aloud how a website that provides “dissident” material could possibly be an agent of the state that it allegedly opposes; "after all," these people will ask, "if GNN is with the state, why would it run anti-Bush headlines? Isn’t "propaganda" something obvious, like the pro-military posters of the Second World War?" Well, yes, it can be; but propaganda – as disinformation – can manifest itself in many different, more complex ways. Recall that, in George Orwell’s magnus opus 1984, there are two notable parties seemingly at war with each other: the tyrannical state, which controls all of the mainstream media in a very obvious, overbearing way, and the “Brotherhood,” a band of anti-government rebels who subvert the state through open resistance and an underground literature trade. By the end of the book, it’s revealed that both the state and the Brotherhood are controlled by the same interests, and the tension between the two is essentially fictional; while the state controls the majority through blatant propaganda and a forceful subversion of human intellectual faculties, the Brotherhood controls the minority who, for whatever reason, see beyond the more obvious propaganda. By creating an anti-government resistance movement, the government of 1984 – the original “Big Brother” – ensures its own complete control of its populace, for even those opposing it are simultaneously fighting for it, albeit unknowingly.

Such is the case with most modern propaganda, including GNN; it works because we are unaware that we are even exposed to it. Taking into account things like Operation Mockingbird – which turned over 400 domestic American journalists into CIA assets by the late 1960’s – as well as the mystifying, irrelevant nature of mainstream commercial television and radio, we can with a reasonable degree of certainty conclude that the mainstream American media is already essentially controlled by the state, or at least manipulated by the corporate interests that today dictate policy to the most powerful sectors of the state. Such an arrangement may suffice for indoctrinating and brainwashing "the American majority, or … 80-90% [of the population]… the bewildered herd" as propaganda expert Nancy Snow put it, but it leaves dissident media – and indeed free thinkers in general – totally unaccounted for. Thus are born the popular leftist “gate-keepers” of conspiracy lore; intelligence-connected institutions like the aforementioned Ford Foundation funnel money to moderate-left media establishments like Democracy Now or GNN in the interests of drowning out radical or revolutionary thought and legitimizing moderate beliefs and opinions. The term “gate-keepers” refers to the power that moderate leftists like Amy Goodman or Anthony Lappe can thus receive, as they are able to essentially decide what is or is not appropriate for discussion among contemporary leftists, and will thus essentially set the agenda for many in their audience.

As a CIA-connected (and, it would seem, CIA-funded) media source, GNN has several primary functions of invaluable importance to the state: it draws political radicals to the site, urges them to publish their views and opinions with blogs and message boards (thus exposing their thoughts to analysis), and serves to moderate their opinions over time through editorial intervention (as with Anthony’s chronic bias against the 9/11 truth movement or his attacks on mathematical certainties). GNN also has a functional purpose which is achieved through the structure and nature of the website itself: it compels political radicals to waste their time sitting at their computers exchanging articles with other like-minded political radicals instead of doing something truly conducive to change, like learning to grow their own food or taking part in direct action. In terms of both its distractionary and manipulative properties, GNN possesses all of the signs of a typical media psy-op; its readers’ minds are being manipulated in subtle ways every time they visit it, from the promotion of the democracy lie and the fictional Republican-versus-Democrat dialectic to the regular legitimization of authority and statism.

To conclude and summarize, I’ll simply urge the reader to let the facts be understood: All four of the owners of GNN are elites; one of them is confirmed to have worked on a USIA propaganda operation, and one of them is confirmed to have worked on a propaganda operation that
appears to have been a CIA front. Another one of them worked as an investment banker for an Israeli intelligence-connected technology firm. Throw in the fact that GNN bears all of the hallmarks of a disinformation operation, and you’ve got a more-than-compelling case. Guerrilla News Network is a Psy-Op.

Down With Fake Guerrilla News Network?

2009-10-09T07:48:00.000-07:00

It seems the premier phony 9/11 Truth website, Guerrilla News Network, is shutting it's doors.

As it goes with all fake 9/11 and Alternative News websites, GNN.tv has been propping up the official theory that Islamic Extremism was behind the 9/11 Attacks for almost 10 years now!

The Guerrilla News Network's owners are in discussions on what to do with their creation, GNN.TV. They're not happy with how the community has turned out so they want to squash it.

"the other issue is one of journalistic legacy. anthony and i are both working writers and journalists." - Stephen Marshall aka Sivlerback

I guess that's the real reason they want to close the doors. Looking in from the outside you might think this a reasonable response. But I now for a fact that the proven liar Stephen Marshall helped and wanted the GNN Community he now wants to squash.

For years the GNN founders allowed a community built on distrust and bullying to flourish. They provided the platform and encouraged the approach. Even at one point hiring one of the most obvious and combative trolls as a programmer for the GNN.TV website. He later lied about it until a screen shot proved that the programmer was using multiple user names.

And what about years wroth of user contributed content?

Here's what Stephen Marshall had to say about the deleting of user content and contributions:

"of course any work would be archived and wouldn’t be deleted. conspiracy theories aside" - Stephen Marshall

I'm assuming 'conspiracy theories' refers to all 9/11 Research that does not prop up the phony myth of Islamic Extremism and it's role as alleged mastermind of the 9/11/2001 attacks.

As a long time GNN user since late 2002, I am more inclined to believe that Anthony Lappe' and Stephen Marshall are closing the doors because either:

their mission has been accomplished OR
because they've been thoroughly debunked as, at best, fake activists who saw a career opportunity with the War On Terror or actual propaganda agents helping control discussion OR
a combination of 1 and 2

According to GNN founder Stephen Marshall he's just not happy with the fuck the man attitude of his Guerrilla community. Are you kidding Stephen? Or should I call you Silverback? which is what the lead Guerriilla of a pack is called.

For years I witnessed GNN founder Anthony Lappe' and prominent disinformation specialist Sander Hicks discuss the most ridiculous 9/11 related theories as if they were GOLD. While the GNN community was bullied when discussion Controlled Demolition, Sander was free to post obvious disinformation like the story of Delmart Vreeland or the disinformation he calls The Graham Report.

As long as the discussion was about the phony threat of Islamic Extremism and it's relation to the 9/11 Attacks, you weren't bullied at GNN.TV. Sound familiar to your experience? Just like 911blogger.com and truthaction.org, GNN.TV routinely deleted discussions and banned users for discussing certain issues, especially that of Controlled Demolition.

And did you know that a few prominent 9/11 Truthers were GNNers first?

For example:

Sander Hicks - This buddy of GNN founder Anthony Lappe' brought us these fake 9/11 truth stories:

Delmart Vreeland: Wild Card
Randy Glass and the Pakistani ISI
The Graham Report
Sander Hick's 9/11/2006 Anniversary Article

I always thought it strange how Sander Hick's got such a warm welcome from GNN when he was posting the most obvious disinformation like Delmart Vreeland: Wildcard and The Graham Report.

I wasn't surprised to find that Anthony Lappe' wrote the forward in his buddy Sander's book, The Big Wedding. Now I understand why certain theories were given the green light. As long as the discussion stayed on the phony threat of Islamic Extremism and it's alleged sponsorship of the 9/11 Attacks, it was ok.

Reprehensor
This anonymous self appointed leader of the fake 9/11 Truth movement was a long time GNN contributor who focused on 9/11 Truth issues. Reprehensor decided to stop participating on GNN.TV because of an article titled "IS GNN A PSYOP?" that was written in 2006.

See: http://reprehensor.gnn.tv/

I was personally behind much of the research for the article "Is GNN A Psyop?" and I'm honored that a such a hight-status fake 9/11 Truther like Reprehensor would find it so valuable as to leave GNN because of it. He would migrate to www.911blogger.com from there where he became the owner and moderator of 9/11 Truth discussion.

I did not write the article or have any sort of control over what went in it. But my research is all over it. The article is discussed below with a link to the actual article. Coupled with my years of experience with GNN.TV, the article shows these guys are 100% establishment and possibly an intelligence propaganda operation.

YT aka Cosmos - This Founder of TruthAction.org was also a long time GNN.TV contributor who was exposed for using over 25 different user accounts on the GNN message boards. At a time when I was begging the founders to stop users from bullying the discussion boards with multiple user names, my buddy YT had over 25 different user accounts!

I helped YT set up the first version of the TruthAction.org Forums and the TruthAction.org website. Years later when I started discussing things I was banned with no explanation and no response from YT or moderators at TruthAction.org. My discussions were locked and removed from the forum with no explanation.

Is GNN a PSYOP Article

This article painted Anthony Lappe' as Columbia School of Journalism graduate who got recruited by the USIA, the propaganda arm of the US State Department. After being recruited by a USIA chief in Jerusalem in the late 90's, he traveled to Palestine to train journalists for the US State Department. Claiming that he didn't know what the USIA was, this journalism graduate now regrets getting caught up with the USIA.

I was surprised to find out that the founders Anthony Lappe' and Stephen Marshall had no idea that their projects were being funded by the Ford Foundation, a foundation known to have been used to funnel money from the CIA to fake activists groups in the United States. I informed Lappe' that the Ford Foundation had contributed over $200,000.00 to the Guerrilla News Network, it's founders and their media projects.

The article continues with information on the other founders of GNN.TV.

Stephen Marshall - While Anthony Lappe' was doing his gig with the US State Department, Stephen Marshall was beaming a secret underground radio broadcast into Nigeria after being hand picked by a Nigerian activist.

Ian Inaba - The money man for GNN.TV, was working for Choice Point and Gil Schwed, an Israeli billionaire and founder of Choice Point who once served in an elite Israeli military unit specializing in Computers and Network intrusion.

Although the article and the ensuing debate on the credibility of these individuals and the Guerrilla News Network have been deleted from the GNN.TV forums and GNN blogosphere, they have been saved in various places on the net.

Read the article: Is GNN A PSYOP?

The Ridiculous War On Terror

2009-09-18T09:00:00.000-07:00

Image by Stephen Baack via Flickr

Can you believe your eyes? Tim Russert and Donald Rumsfeld are criminals.

This propaganda is just one example of many where these men used blatant fabrication and propaganda to mentally warp your understanding of the events of 9/11/2001.

These are the men who defined the 'official theory' behind the 9/11/2001 attacks.

America, this is outrageous. These men are criminals. Please talk to everyone you know about 9/11/2001.

Tony Blair's 9 11 Bin Laden Dossier

2009-09-10T13:47:00.001-07:00

Image via Wikipedia

Below you will find the text of a document released by the office of Tony Blair, former British Prime Minister who served during and after 9/11/2001. The dossier, titled Terrorist Atrocities in the United States, was used as one of the first descriptions of the officially accepted explanation about the 9/11 attacks.

I thought it might help to take a second look at what exactly the 'Official Theory About 9/11' is. What exactly do Bill Maher and Bill O'reilly consider acceptable when it comes to 9/11/2001? These two anti-9/11 Truth loud mouths have been especially disrespectful to 9/11 Truth related issues and activists. They've called people crazy and suggested they need medical and mental help, and Bill even issued a veiled death threat to one 9/11 Truth advocate when he suggested the activist would be 'floating down the Charles River' if he were to teach at the same university that Bill attended.

This treatment trickles through the air waves. I've had friends taht insinuate that I am crazy for discussing these topics. Unless, that is, I support the view that Al Quaeda and Muslim fanatics were behind the attacks on 9/11/2001. That gets a pass every time.

So what theory to these guys accept? What theory does Bill Maher support? What theory do you support? How strong is the evidence? Who's really crazy?

The text below comes from the document that was used as proof that Osama Bin Laden and Al Quaeda were responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001. Tony Blair released this document to justify the British involvement in the War On Terror after 9/11/2001.

I feel that the dossier represents the Official Theory about 9/11/2001.

Responsibility for the Terrorist Atrocities in the United States

This document does not purport to provide a prosecutable case against Osama Bin Laden in a court of law.

Intelligence often cannot be used evidentially, due both to the strict rules of admissibility and to the need to protect the safety of sources.

But on the basis of all the information available HMG is confident of its conclusions as expressed in this document.

Introduction

1. The clear conclusions reached by the government are: Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda, the terrorist network which he heads, planned and carried out the atrocities on 11 September 2001; Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda retain the will and resources to carry out further atrocities; The United Kingdom, and United Kingdom nationals are potential targets; and Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda were able to commit these atrocities because of their close alliance with the Taleban regime, which allowed them to operate with impunity in pursuing their terrorist activity.

2. The material in respect of 1998 and the USS Cole comes from indictments and intelligence sources. The material in respect of 11 September comes from intelligence and the criminal investigation to date. The details of some aspects cannot be given, but the facts are clear from the intelligence.

3. The document does not contain the totality of the material known to HMG, given the continuing and absolute need to protect intelligence sources.

Summary

4. The relevant facts show: Background Al-Qaeda is a terrorist organisation with ties to a global network, which has been in existence for over 10 years. It was founded, and has been led at all times, by Osama Bin Laden. Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda have been engaged in a jihad against the United States, and its allies. One of their stated aims is the murder of US citizens, and attacks on America's allies. Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda have been based in Afghanistan since 1996, but have a network of operations throughout the world.

The network includes training camps, warehouses, communication facilities and commercial operations able to raise significant sums of money to support its activity.

That activity includes substantial exploitation of the illegal drugs trade from Afghanistan.

Osama Bin Laden's al-Qaeda and the Taleban regime have a close and mutually dependent alliance.

Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda provide the Taleban regime with material, financial and military support.

They jointly exploit the drugs trade. The Taleban regime allows Bin Laden to operate his terrorist training camps and activities from Afghanistan, protects him from attacks from outside, and protects the drugs stockpiles.

Osama Bin Laden could not operate his terrorist activities without the alliance and support of the Taleban regime.

The Taleban's strength would be seriously weakened without Osama Bin Laden's military and financial support.

Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda have the capability to execute major terrorist attacks. Osama Bin Laden has claimed credit for the attack on US soldiers in Somalia in October 1993, which killed 18; for the attack on the US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in August 1998 which killed 224 and injured nearly 5000; and were linked to the attack on the USS Cole on 12 October 2000, in which 17 crew members were killed and 40 others injured.

They have sought to acquire nuclear and chemical materials for use as terrorist weapons.

In relation to the terrorist attacks on 11 September:

5. After 11 September we learned that, not long before, Bin Laden had indicated he was about to launch a major attack on America.

The detailed planning for the terrorist attacks of 11 September was carried out by one of Osama Bin Laden's close associates.

Of the 19 hijackers involved in 11 September 2001, it has already been established that at least three had links with al-Qaeda.

The attacks on 11 September 2001 were similar in both their ambition and intended impact to previous attacks undertaken by Osama Bin laden and al-Qaeda, and also had features in common. In particular:

Suicide attackers

(a) Co-ordinated attacks on the same day

(b) The aim to cause maximum American casualties

(c) Total disregard for other casualties, including Muslims

Meticulous long-term planning (a) Absence of warning.

6. Al-Qaeda retains the capability and the will to make further attacks on the US and its allies, including the United Kingdom.

7. Al-Qaeda gives no warning of terrorist attack.

The facts

Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda

8. In 1989 Osama Bin Laden, and others, founded an international terrorist group known as "al-Qaeda" (the Base). At all times he has been the leader of al-Qaeda.

9. From 1989 until 1991 Osama Bin Laden was based in Afghanistan and Peshawar, Pakistan.

In 1991 he moved to Sudan, where he stayed until 1996. In that year he returned to Afghanistan, where he remains.

The Taleban Regime

10. The Taleban emerged from the Afghan refugee camps in Pakistan in the early 1990s.

By 1996 they had captured Kabul. They are still engaged in a bloody civil war to control the whole of Afghanistan. They are led by Mullah Omar.

11. In 1996 Osama Bin Laden moved back to Afghanistan. He established a close relationship with Mullah Omar, and threw his support behind the Taleban.

Osama Bin Laden and the Taleban regime have a close alliance on which both depend for their continued existence.

They also share the same religious values and vision.

12. Osama Bin Laden has provided the Taleban regime with troops, arms, and money to fight the Northern Alliance.

He is closely involved with Taleban military training, planning and operations. He has representatives in the Taleban military command structure.

He has also given infrastructure assistance and humanitarian aid. Forces under the control of Osama Bin Laden have fought alongside the Taleban in the civil war in Afghanistan.

13. Omar has provided Bin Laden with a safe haven in which to operate, and has allowed him to establish terrorist training camps in Afghanistan.

They jointly exploit the Afghan drugs trade. In return for active al-Qaeda support, the Taleban allow al-Qaeda to operate freely, including planning, training and preparing for terrorist activity.

In addition the Taleban provide security for the stockpiles of drugs.

14. Since 1996, when the Taleban captured Kabul, the United States government has consistently raised with them a whole range of issues, including humanitarian aid and terrorism.

Well before 11 September 2001 they had provided evidence to the Taleban of the responsibility of al-Qaeda for the terrorist attacks in East Africa.

This evidence had been provided to senior leaders of the Taleban at their request.

15. The United States government had made it clear to the Taleban regime that al-Qaeda had murdered US citizens, and planned to murder more.

The US offered to work with the Taleban to expel the terrorists from Afghanistan.

These talks, which have been continuing since 1996, have failed to produce any results.

16. In June 2001, in the face of mounting evidence of the al-Qaeda threat, the United States warned the Taleban that it had the right to defend itself and that it would hold the regime responsible for attacks against US citizens by terrorists sheltered in Afghanistan.

17. In this, the United States had the support of the United Nations.

The Security Council, in Resolution 1267, condemned Osama Bin Laden for sponsoring international terrorism and operating a network of terrorist camps, and demanded that the Taleban surrender Osama Bin Laden without further delay so that he could be brought to justice.

18. Despite the evidence provided by the US of the responsibility of Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda for the 1998 East Africa bombings, despite the accurately perceived threats of further atrocities, and despite the demands of the United Nations, the Taleban regime responded by saying no evidence existed against Osama Bin Laden, and that neither he nor his network would be expelled.

19. A former Government official in Afghanistan has described the Taleban and Osama Bin Laden as "two sides of the same coin: Osama cannot exist in Afghanistan without the Taleban and the Taleban cannot exist without Osama".

Al-Qaeda

20. Al-Qaeda is dedicated to opposing 'UN-Islamic' governments in Muslim countries with force and violence.

21. Al-Qaeda virulently opposes the United States. Osama Bin Laden has urged and incited his followers to kill American citizens, in the most unequivocal terms.

22. On 12 October 1996 he issued a declaration of jihad as follows: "The people of Islam have suffered from aggression, iniquity and injustice imposed by the Zionist-Crusader alliance and their collaborators...

"It is the duty now on every tribe in the Arabian peninsula to fight jihad and cleanse the land from these Crusader occupiers. Their wealth is booty to those who kill them.

"My Muslim brothers: your brothers in Palestine and in the land of the two Holy Places [i.e. Saudi Arabia] are calling upon your help and asking you to take part in fighting against the enemy - the Americans and the Israelis.

"They are asking you to do whatever you can to expel the enemies out of the sanctities of Islam."

Later in the same year he said that "terrorising the American occupiers [of Islamic Holy Places] is a religious and logical obligation".

In February 1998 he issued and signed a 'fatwa' which included a decree to all Muslims: "...the killing of Americans and their civilian and military allies is a religious duty for each and every Muslim to be carried out in whichever country they are until Al Aqsa mosque has been liberated from their grasp and until their armies have left Muslim lands".

In the same 'fatwa' he called on Muslim scholars and their leaders and their youths to "launch an attack on the American soldiers of Satan".

And he concluded: "We - with God's help - call on every Muslim who believes in God and wishes to be rewarded to comply with God's order to kill Americans and plunder their money whenever and wherever they find it.

"We also call on Muslim...to launch the raid on Satan's US troops and the devil's supporters allying with them, and to displace those who are behind them."

When asked, in 1998, about obtaining chemical or nuclear weapons he said "acquiring such weapons for the defence of Muslims [was] a religious duty".

In an interview aired on Al Jazira (Doha, Qatar) television he stated: "Our enemy is every American male, whether he is directly fighting us or paying taxes."

In two interviews broadcast on US television in 1997 and 1998 he referred to the terrorists who carried out the earlier attack on the World Trade Center in 1993 as "role models".

He went on to exhort his followers "to take the fighting to America."

23. From the early 1990s Osama Bin Laden has sought to obtain nuclear and chemical materials for use as weapons of terror.

24. Although US targets are al-Qaeda's priority, it also explicitly threatens the United States' allies.

References to "Zionist-Crusader alliance and their collaborators," and to "Satan's US troops and the devil's supporters allying with them" are references which unquestionably include the United Kingdom.

25. There is a continuing threat. Based on our experience of the way the network has operated in the past, other cells, like those that carried out the terrorist attacks on 11 September, must be assumed to exist.

26. Al-Qaeda functions both on its own and through a network of other terrorist organisations.

These include Egyptian Islamic Jihad and other north African Islamic extremist terrorist groups, and a number of other jihadi groups in other countries including the Sudan, Yemen, Somalia, Pakistan and India.

Al-Qaeda also maintains cells and personnel in a number of other countries to facilitate its activities.

27. Osama Bin Laden heads the al-Qaeda network.

Below him is a body known as the Shura, which includes representatives of other terrorist groups, such as Egyptian Islamic Jihad leader Ayman Zawahiri and prominent lieutenants of Bin Laden such as Abu Hafs Al-Masri. Egyptian Islamic Jihad has, in effect, merged with al-Qaeda.

28. In addition to the Shura, al-Qaeda has several groups dealing with military, media, financial and Islamic issues.

29. Mohamed Atef is a member of the group that deals with military and terrorist operations.

His duties include principal responsibility for training al-Qaeda members.

30. Members of al-Qaeda must make a pledge of allegiance to follow the orders of Osama Bin Laden.

31. A great deal of evidence about Osama Bin Laden and al-Qaeda has been made available in the US indictment for earlier crimes.

32. Since 1989, Osama Bin Laden has conducted substantial financial and business transactions on behalf of al-Qaeda and in pursuit of its goals.

These include purchasing land for training camps, purchasing warehouses for the storage of items, including explosives, purchasing communications and electronics equipment, and transporting currency and weapons to members of al-Qaeda and associated terrorist groups in countries throughout the world.

33. Since 1989 Osama Bin Laden has provided training camps and guest houses in Afghanistan, Pakistan, the Sudan, Somalia and Kenya for the use of al-Qaeda and associated terrorist groups.

We know from intelligence that there are currently at least a dozen camps across Afghanistan, of which at least four are used for training terrorists.

34. Since 1989, Osama Bin Laden has established a series of businesses to provide income for al-Qaeda, and to provide cover for the procurement of explosives, weapons and chemicals, and for the travel of al-Qaeda operatives.

The businesses have included a holding company known as 'Wadi Al Aqiq', a construction business known as 'Al Hijra', an agricultural business known as 'Al Themar Al Mubaraka', and investment companies known as 'Ladin International' and 'Taba Investments'.

Osama Bin Laden and previous attacks

35. In 1992 and 1993 Mohamed Atef travelled to Somalia on several occasions for the purpose of organising violence against United States and United Nations troops then stationed in Somalia.

On each occasion he reported back to Osama Bin Laden, at his base in the Riyadh district of Khartoum.

36. In the spring of 1993 Atef, Saif al Adel, another senior member of al-Qaeda, and other members began to provide military training to Somali tribes for the purpose of fighting the United Nations forces.

37. On 3 and 4 October 1993 operatives of al-Qaeda participated in the attack on US military personnel serving in Somalia as part of the operation 'Restore Hope'.

Eighteen US military personnel were killed in the attack.

38. From 1993 members of al-Qaeda began to live in Nairobi and set up businesses there, including Asma Ltd, and Tanzanite King.

They were regularly visited there by senior members of al-Qaeda, in particular by Atef and Abu Ubadiah al Banshiri.

39. Beginning in the latter part of 1993, members of al-Qaeda in Kenya began to discuss the possibility of attacking the US Embassy in Nairobi in retaliation for US participation in Operation Restore Hope in Somalia.

Ali Mohamed, a US citizen and admitted member of al-Qaeda, surveyed the US Embassy as a possible target for a terrorist attack.

He took photographs and made sketches, which he presented to Osama Bin Laden while Bin Laden was in Sudan.

He also admitted that he had trained terrorists for al-Qaeda in Afghanistan in the early 1990s, and that those whom he trained included many involved in the East African bombings in August 1998.

40. In June or July 1998, two al-Qaeda operatives, Fahid Mohammed Ali Msalam and Sheik Ahmed Salim Swedan, purchased a Toyota truck and made various alterations to the back of the truck.

41. In early August 1998, operatives of al-Qaeda gathered in 43, New Runda Estates, Nairobi to execute the bombing of the US Embassy in Nairobi.

42. On 7 August 1998, Assam, a Saudi national and al-Qaeda operative, drove the Toyota truck to the US embassy. There was a large bomb in the back of the truck.

43. Also in the truck was Mohamed Rashed Daoud Al 'Owali, another Saudi.

He, by his own confession, was an al-Qaeda operative, who from about 1996 had been trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan in explosives, hijacking, kidnapping, assassination and intelligence techniques.

With Osama Bin Laden's express permission, he fought alongside the Taleban in Afghanistan.

He had met Osama Bin Laden personally in 1996 and asked for another 'mission'.

Osama Bin Laden sent him to East Africa after extensive specialised training at camps in Afghanistan.

44. As the truck approached the Embassy, Al 'Owali got out and threw a stun grenade at a security guard.

Assam drove the truck up to the rear of the embassy. He got out and then detonated the bomb, which demolished a multi-storey secretarial college and severely damaged the US embassy, and the Co-operative bank building.

The bomb killed 213 people and injured 4500. Assam was killed in the explosion.

45. Al 'Owali expected the mission to end in his death. He had been willing to die for al-Qaeda.

But at the last minute he ran away from the bomb truck and survived. He had no money, passport or plan to escape after the mission, because he had expected to die.

46. After a few days, he called a telephone number in Yemen to have money transferred to him in Kenya.

The number he rang in Yemen was contacted by Osama Bin Laden's phone on the same day as Al 'Owali was arranging to get the money.

47. Another person arrested in connection with the Nairobi bombing was Mohamed Sadeek Odeh. He admitted to his involvement.

He identified the principal participants in the bombing. He named three other persons, all of whom were al-Qaeda or Egyptian Islamic Jihad members.

48. In Dar es Salaam the same day, at about the same time, operatives of al-Qaeda detonated a bomb at the US embassy, killing 11 people.

The al-Qaeda operatives involved included Mustafa Mohamed Fadhil and Khaflan Khamis Mohamed.

The bomb was carried in a Nissan Atlas truck, which Ahmed Khfaklan Ghailani and Sheikh Ahmed Salim Swedan, two al-Qaeda operatives, had purchased in July 1998, in Dar es Salaam.

49. Khaflan Khamis Mohamed was arrested for the bombing. He admitted membership of al-Qaeda, and implicated other members of al-Qaeda in the bombing.

50. On 7 and 8 August 1998, two other members of al-Qaeda disseminated claims of responsibility for the two bombings by sending faxes to media organisations in Paris, Doha in Qatar, and Dubai in the United Arab Emirates.

51. Additional evidence of the involvement of al-Qaeda in the East African bombings came from a search conducted in London of several residences and businesses belonging to al-Qaeda and Egyptian Islamic Jihad members.

In those searches a number of documents were found including claims of responsibility for the East African bombings in the name of a fictitious group, 'the Islamic Army for the liberation of the Holy Places.'

52. Al 'Owali, the would-be suicide bomber, admitted he was told to make a videotape of himself using the name of the same fictitious group.

53. The faxed claims of responsibility were traced to a telephone number, which had been in contact with Osama Bin Laden's cell phone.

The claims disseminated to the press were clearly written by someone familiar with the conspiracy.

They stated that the bombings had been carried out by two Saudis in Kenya, and one Egyptian in Dar es Salaam.

They were probably sent before the bombings had even taken place.

They referred to two Saudis dying in the Nairobi attack. In fact, because Al 'Owali fled at the last minute, only one Saudi died.

54. On 22 December 1998 Osama Bin Laden was asked by Time magazine whether he was responsible for the August 1998 attacks.

He replied: "The International Islamic Jihad Front for the jihad against the US and Israel has, by the grace of God, issued a crystal clear fatwa calling on the Islamic nation to carry on Jihad aimed at liberating the holy sites.

"The nation of Mohammed has responded to this appeal. If instigation for jihad against the Jews and the Americans... is considered to be a crime, then let history be a witness that I am a criminal.

"Our job is to instigate and, by the grace of God, we did that, and certain people responded to this instigation."

He was asked if he knew the attackers: "...those who risked their lives to earn the pleasure of God are real men. They managed to rid the Islamic nation of disgrace. We hold them in the highest esteem."

And what the US could expect of him: "...any thief or criminal who enters another country to steal should expect to be exposed to murder at any time...

"The US knows that I have attacked it, by the grace of God, for more than ten years now...

"God knows that we have been pleased by the killing of American soldiers [in Somalia in 1993].

"This was achieved by the grace of God and the efforts of the mujahideen... Hostility towards America is a religious duty and we hope to be rewarded for it by God.

"I am confident that Muslims will be able to end the legend of the so-called superpower that is America."

55. In December 1999 a terrorist cell linked to al- Qaeda was discovered trying to carry out attacks inside the United States.

An Algerian, Ahmed Ressam, was stopped at the US-Canadian border and over 100 lbs of bomb making material was found in his car.

Ressam admitted he was planning to set off a large bomb at Los Angeles International airport on New Year's Day.

He said that he had received terrorist training at al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan and then been instructed to go abroad and kill US civilians and military personnel.

56. On 3 January 2000, a group of al-Qaeda members, and other terrorists who had trained in al-Qaeda camps in Afghanistan, attempted to attack a US destroyer with a small boat loaded with explosives. Their boat sank, aborting the attack.

57. On 12 October 2000, however, the USS Cole was struck by an explosive-laden boat while refuelling in Aden harbour. Seventeen crew were killed, and 40 injured.

58. Several of the perpetrators of the Cole attack (mostly Yemenis and Saudis) were trained at Osama Bin Laden's camps in Afghanistan.

Al 'Owali has identified the two commanders of the attack on the USS Cole as having participated in the planning and preparation for the East African embassy bombings.

59. In the months before the September 11 attacks, propaganda videos were distributed throughout the Middle East and Muslim world by al-Qaeda, in which Osama Bin Laden and others were shown encouraging Muslims to attack American and Jewish targets.

60. Similar videos, extolling violence against the United States and other targets, were distributed before the East African embassy attacks in August 1998.

Osama Bin Laden and the 11 September attacks

61. Nineteen men have been identified as the hijackers from the passenger lists of the four planes hijacked on 11 September 2001.

At least three of them have already been positively identified as associates of al-Qaeda.

One has been identified as playing key roles in both the East African embassy attacks and the USS Cole attack.

Investigations continue into the backgrounds of all the hijackers.

62. From intelligence sources, the following facts have been established subsequent to 11 September; for intelligence reasons, the names of associates, though known, are not given.

In the run-up to 11 September, bin Laden was mounting a concerted propaganda campaign amongst like-minded groups of people - including videos and documentation - justifying attacks on Jewish and American targets; and claiming that those who died in the course of them were carrying out God's work.

We have learned, subsequent to 11 September, that Bin Laden himself asserted shortly before 11 September that he was preparing a major attack on America.

In August and early September close associates of Bin Laden were warned to return to Afghanistan from other parts of the world by 10 September.

Immediately prior to 11 September some known associates of Bin Laden were naming the date for action as on or around 11 September.

Since 11 September we have learned that one of Bin Laden's closest and most senior associates was responsible for the detailed planning of the attacks.

There is evidence of a very specific nature relating to the guilt of Bin Laden and his associates that is too sensitive to release.

63. Osama Bin Laden remains in charge, and the mastermind, of al-Qaeda. In al-Qaeda, an operation on the scale of the 11 September attacks would have been approved by Osama Bin Laden himself.

64. The modus operandi of 11 September was entirely consistent with previous attacks.

Al Qaeda's record of atrocities is characterised by meticulous long term planning, a desire to inflict mass casualties, suicide bombers, and multiple simultaneous attacks.

65. The attacks of 11 September 2001 are entirely consistent with the scale and sophistication of the planning which went into the attacks on the East African Embassies and the USS Cole.

No warnings were given for these three attacks, just as there was none on 11 September.

66. Al-Qaeda operatives, in evidence given in the East African Embassy bomb trials, have described how the group spends years preparing for an attack.

They conduct repeated surveillance, patiently gather materials, and identify and vet operatives, who have the skills to participate in the attack and the willingness to die for their cause.

67. The operatives involved in the 11 September atrocities attended flight schools, used flight simulators to study the controls of larger aircraft and placed potential airports and routes under surveillance.

68. Al-Qaeda's attacks are characterised by total disregard for innocent lives, including Muslims.

In an interview after the East African bombings, Osama Bin Laden insisted that the need to attack the United States excused the killing of other innocent civilians, Muslim and non-Muslim alike.

69. No other organisation has both the motivation and the capability to carry out attacks like those of the 11 September - only the al-Qaeda network under Osama Bin Laden.

Conclusion

70. The attacks of the 11 September 2001 were planned and carried out by al-Qaeda, an organisation whose head is Osama Bin Laden.

That organisation has the will, and the resources, to execute further attacks of similar scale.

Both the United States and its close allies are targets for such attacks.

The attack could not have occurred without the alliance between the Taleban and Osama Bin Laden, which allowed Bin Laden to operate freely in Afghanistan, promoting, planning and executing terrorist activity.

Charlie Sheen Meets Obama To Discuss New Investigation Into 9-11 Attacks

2009-09-09T06:15:00.000-07:00

Charlie had a 20 minute meeting with President Obama which was dedicated to why we need a new investigation into the attacks on 9/11/2001 ! ??! ??

Charlie Sheen is speaking up once again about the cover-up of the 9/11/2001 attacks. A few years ago Charlie publicly questioned the official explanation of the 9/11 attacks. There was rumors he was going to narrate the 9/11 movie '911 Loose Change 2nd Edition' but it never happened. That didn't stop Bill O'Reilly and other nut cases like him from threatening Sheen for speaking out.

When ever I hear about these super-stars and personalities who risk it all by demanding the truth, it energizes me and gives me hope that the truth will and has prevailed.

Even as the main stream talking heads and nutty pundits routinely issue vailed death threats and demand the employment termination of those asking for a new 9/11 investigation Charlie and others forge ahead. Like Rosie O'Donnell and others, he's risking his lively hood and maybe even his life so that the truth may be told.

Below is the transcript of Charlie Sheen's fictional meeting called "Twenty Minutes With The President".

Thank You Charlie Sheen. You have surely inspired others to demand the truth. Here's a song I wrote called "It Aint' A Burden" to tell the truth. It's fun! The melody is mostly taken from the song "Wagon Wheel" performed by Old Crow Medicine Show.

Twenty Minutes With The President

By Charlie Sheen
Tuesday, September 8, 2009

I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.

Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.

President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.

CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.

PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.

CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.

PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.

CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.

PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.

CS - Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.

PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.

CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?

PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.

CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?

PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.

CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.

(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)

PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?

CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.

PBO - Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?

CS – Good guess Mr. President.

(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)

CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.

(the President glances into the folder I handed him)

CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”

PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….

CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”

(the President continues to view the documents)

CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:

“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”

He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!

PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.

CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??

PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?

CS - Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.

PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.

CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?

PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.

CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.

PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.

CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.

PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.

CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.

PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.

(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).

CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?

PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.

CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?

PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.

CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?

PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.

CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?

PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.

CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.

(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)

PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.

CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.

PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.

CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.

PBO – As you wish. Please continue.

CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “Operation Northwoods”, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.

PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.

CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.

PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.

(the President checks his watch)

CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.

PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.

CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.

PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.

CS – No argument sir, I‘m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “Rebuilding Americas Defenses”, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)

PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”

CS – Touché, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?

PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.

CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?

PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.

CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.

PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.

CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.

PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.

CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.

PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.

CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.

CS – Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.

CS – Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”

WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.

CS – Number 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.

CS – Number 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360’, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.

Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.

CS – Number 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.

Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.

CS – Number 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.

CS – Number 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.

Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.

CS – Number 9; Scores of main stream news outlets reported that the F.B.I. conducted an investigation of at least FIVE of the 9/11 hijackers being trained at U.S. military flight schools. Those investigations are now sealed and need to be declassified.

CS – Number 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.

As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”

CS – Number 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.

CS – Number 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.

In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”

CS – Number 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.

However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.

According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.

CS – Number 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.

CS – Number 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.

During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”

As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?

CS – Number 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.

CS – Number 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.

CS – Number 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.

CS – Number 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.

CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.

At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.

(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).

PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.

(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).

CS – Mr. President! One more second!

(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).

CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -

(He pauses. We shake hands).

CS – Make sure your on the right side of history.

(The President breaks the handshake).

PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.

(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)

Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.

This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.

Charlie Sheen.

Van Jones And The 9/11 Petition That Fired Him

2009-09-07T06:58:00.000-07:00

Van Jones was once President Obama's green jobs czar. When it was revealed that he signed an extremely crazy 9/11 petition in 2004, he was forced to resign. For more information on Van Jones and the crazy 9/11 petition that got him fired see the link below.

Van Jones 9/11 Petition - http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/09/06/obama.adviser.resigns/index.html

Apparently, if you believe the US Government failed to adequately explain and investigate the 9/11 Attacks, you can't have a job at high levels of government. Oh well, I wasn't planning on being in that club anyway!

This glaring example of intimidation is yet another direct threat to those who question the official 9/11 explanation. Someone really doesn't want you to question the official explanation of 9/11/2001. Why?

I find it interesting that all the talking heads want to do is discuss how crazy this guy is because he...signed a 9/11 Petition. But no one talks about what was in the petition that was so crazy and extreme as to warrant Van Jone's resignation.

I've read and maybe even signed the same petition. I've signed many 9/11 related petitions. I actually feel that the questions on the petition are rather tame and might include 9/11 related disinformation. But apparently they are extremely crazy and anyone believing this stuff should be fired right?

So what was this petition that got Van Jones to resign his post in the Obama Administration? When questions does he want answered that are so crazy? Let's take a look...

http://911truth.org/article.php?story=20090904181706887

The Statement

We Want Real Answers About 9/11

On August 31, 2004, Zogby International, the official North American political polling agency for Reuters, released a poll that found nearly half (49.3%) of New York City residents and 41% of those in New York state believe US leaders had foreknowledge of impending 9/11 attacks and "consciously failed" to act. Of the New York City residents, 66% called for a new probe of unanswered questions by Congress or the New York Attorney General.

In connection with this news, we have assembled 100 notable Americans and 40 family members of those who died to sign this 9/11 Statement, which calls for immediate public attention to unanswered questions that suggest that people within the current administration may indeed have deliberately allowed 9/11 to happen, perhaps as a pretext for war.

We want truthful answers to questions such as:

1. Why were standard operating procedures for dealing with hijacked airliners not followed that day?

2. Why were the extensive missile batteries and air defenses reportedly deployed around the Pentagon not activated during the attack?

3. Why did the Secret Service allow Bush to complete his elementary school visit, apparently unconcerned about his safety or that of the schoolchildren?

4. Why hasn't a single person been fired, penalized, or reprimanded for the gross incompetence we witnessed that day?

5. Why haven't authorities in the U.S. and abroad published the results of multiple investigations into trading that strongly suggested foreknowledge of specific details of the 9/11 attacks, resulting in tens of millions of dollars of traceable gains?

6. Why has Sibel Edmonds, a former FBI translator who claims to have knowledge of advance warnings, been publicly silenced with a gag order requested by Attorney General Ashcroft and granted by a Bush-appointed judge?

7. How could Flight 77, which reportedly hit the Pentagon, have flown back towards Washington D.C. for 40 minutes without being detected by the FAA's radar or the even superior radar possessed by the US military?

8. How were the FBI and CIA able to release the names and photos of the alleged hijackers within hours, as well as to visit houses, restaurants, and flight schools they were known to frequent?

9. What happened to the over 20 documented warnings given our government by 14 foreign intelligence agencies or heads of state?

10. Why did the Bush administration cover up the fact that the head of the Pakistani intelligence agency was in Washington the week of 9/11 and reportedly had $100,000 wired to Mohamed Atta, considered the ringleader of the hijackers?

11. Why did the 911 Commission fail to address most of the questions posed by the families of the victims, in addition to almost all of the questions posed here?

12. Why was Philip Zelikow chosen to be the Executive Director of the ostensibly independent 911 Commission although he had co-authored a book with Condoleezza Rice?

Those who are demanding deeper inquiry now number in the hundreds of thousands, including a former member of the first Bush administration, a retired Air Force colonel, a European parliamentarian, families of the victims, highly respected authors, investigative journalists, peace and justice leaders, former Pentagon staff, and the National Green Party.

As Americans of conscience, we ask for four things:

1. An immediate investigation by New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer
2. Immediate investigation in Congressional Hearings.
3. Media attention to scrutinize and investigate the evidence.
4. The formation of a truly independent citizens-based inquiry.

Given the importance of the coming election, we feel it is imperative that these questions be addressed publicly, honestly, and rigorously so that Americans may exercise their democratic rights with full awareness.

In closing, we pray and hope for the strength to approach this subject with wisdom and compassion so that we may heal from the wounds inflicted on that terrible day.

I find the questions in the petition rather tame. Knowing that 3 buildings were pre-set for controlled demolitions on 9/11/2001, these questions seem a bit off to me. Someone literally wired those buildings with explosives. The hijackings were a diversion and we should never lend legitimacy to the "911 Hijacker Theory".

It's time to ask yourself:

Why can't I question the official theory of the 9/11 attacks without being threatened, fired and ostracized by the media?

It's time to start asking the questi0on:

Who was responsible for the attacks on 9/11/2001?

Rosie O'Donnell Should Be Strung Up For Treason, Right?

2009-08-30T04:35:00.001-07:00

Since 9/11/2001 main stream media, news and culture has attempted to squash all discussion and questioning of the official theory that Islamic Extremist were responsible for the 911 attacks.

I've begun to compile the top 10 most extreme and bizarre examples of main stream society, news and media abusing anyone who questions the official explanation that of the attacks on 9/11/2001. I've started with the two most memorable moments and will add them as I locate videos. If you have other examples, please contact me and I'll add them.

1. Bill O'Reilly Attacks 9/11 Victim's Son, Jeremy Glick, For Discussing 9/11 Attacks

Jeremy Glick, who's dad died on 9/11/2001 in NYC, schools Bill in this famous argument between O'Reilly and the young Glick. The O'Reilly Factor singled out Glick soon after 9/11/2001 because he signed an anti-war statement about the war in Afghanistan. They got him onto the show but got a little more then they bargained for.

2. "If any body had a rope thick enough, Rosie should be strung up for treason" - Danny Bonaduce with Joe Scarborough

This quote comes from a juiced-up bully named Danny Bonaducci. He was on MSNBC's Joe Scarborough talk show discussing the epic battle between Rosie O'Donnell and the main stream. In 2007 Rosie publicly questioned the official theory of 9/11/2001 by asking "What happened to WTC 7?" on her tv show 'The View'. She also publicly went against a war with Iran and told American's that US Media is pure propaganda controlled by 4 companies.

Rosie was never my favorite brand of pop-culture personality. However, today I consider her a hero. She asks the tough questions and put her reputation and job on the line. If you're interested in modern American heroes, use Google to follow the entire saga of Rosie O'Donnell when she publicly denounced the official conspiracy theory regarding 9-11 by asking about the demolition of WTC 7.

She's a hero. Look it up.

At 5:15 of this video, Danny says he thinks Rosie should be strung up for treason. And if this comment was sick a twisted enough, he ends it with a joke about Rosie's weight by saying that the hanging could only occur if someone found a rope thick enough to hold up Rosie. This monstrous quote can be found at 5:15 into this video.

3. "...this guy would be, you know, in the Charles River floating down towards the harbor." - Bill O'Reilly

During his program on 11 July, O'Reilly remarked, "This guy would have been gone at Boston University, my alma mater, in a heartbeat. The Chancellor there, John Silber, would have--would have--this guy'd be in the Charles River floating down, you know, toward the harbor."

View Video Here

4. "Stop asking me to raise this issue (WTC 7) and start asking your doctor if Paxil is right for you" Bill Maher

5. "Do we have security in this building or do I have to come over here and kick this guys ass?" and "I'll kick your ass out of here too" - Bill Maher

6. "As far as I'm concerned, you've now stepped over the line into treason, the punishment for which is death and I'm really busy so I might have to kill you right here." - Danny Bonaduce (at 4:08 in the clip below)

7. coming soon

8. coming soon

9. coming soon

10. coming soon

And so we find the 9/11 puzzle fits together exactly

2009-08-28T13:07:00.000-07:00

The interview discussed below was with Susan Lindauer by Michael Collins. I found the article posted by a user at www.911blogger.com. I posted some excerpts here along with my own commentary but I encourage you to read the entire interview / article yourself.

source #1: http://911blogger.com/node/21007

source #2: http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0903/S00028.htm

"And so we find the 9/11 puzzle fits together exactly"...Or so says a "Former Accused Iraqi Agent" that "Reveals Facts about 9/11 Warning". Andy Card's second cousin apparently sat outside of the former Bush chief of staff's home just before 9/11/2001. She nervously chain smoked while waiting in her car for Andy to return home. She wanted to warn him about an impending Jihadi attack on the WTC that involved airplanes. He never showed so the nerve wracked Former Accused Iraqi Agent (???) went home.

Adny Card
Image via Wikipedia

She continues with ""For those who think you've heard the whole story of 9/11, you might be surprised." Well, that is yet to remain seen Susan. Let us first take a look at this possibly explosive testimony and judge for ourselves.

It all sounds so explosive...but is it? Or is it more anti-Muslim 'blame the Islamic Muslim Fanatics' garbage being promoted by the same sources you'd expect to find promoting LIHOP non sense?

For those who don't know, LIHOP stands for Let It Happen On Purpose. This is in conflict with the idea of MIHOP, Make It Happen On Purpose. There is a huge difference and I'd suggest that my readers figuring it out the difference between LIHOP and MIHOP as a first step when investigating the 9/11 Attacks.

The interview was done by Michael Collins with Susan Lindauer. He titles it 'Former Accused Iraqi Agent Reveals Facts About 9/11'. The interview is preluded with a statement by Susan which explains why she is willing to provide facts about her teams so-called '9/11 pre-warnings'.

The article touches on many issues including the Israeli Mossad and 9/11, Lockerbie bombing suspect, a scientist whom she compares to Spock of Star-Trek, and my favorite is the so called 'CIA Handler'. She identifies her CIA handler as "Dr. Richard Fuisz (FUZE) is the most fascinating individual I have encountered in my life."

That's a tall cup to fill. I can only hope that all CIA officers make such a positive impression on the unwitting 'assets' they handle.

The story goes like this....

Image by Limbic via Flickr

Susan is the 2nd cousin of Andy Card and an anti-war / anti-terrorism intelligence liaison to Libya and Iraq. She claims to have been part of a team including a CIA HANDLER named Dr. Richar Fuisz who had inside info about a Jihadi attack on the WTC complex. This all took place before 9/11/2001.

When asked what first sparked her interest in Airplane attacks on the WTC pre-9/11/2001, she says:

"As Dr. Fuisz used to say, terrorist groups thought that for all the mighty resources of U.S. Intelligence, the U.S. was either too stupid to catch them. Or we were afraid because the real terrorists are "too big." Either of those beliefs stood to create a huge and irresistible provocation to the younger generation of jihadis. On that basis, we drew up an extreme threat scenario that the next major attack would most likely involve airplane hijackings or airplane bombings.

That is exactly what happened by the way.

Back in the 1980s, Osama bin Laden called Ahmed Jibril "a hero" and "the greatest fighter against Israel who ever lived."

Sure enough, my own extensive sources in the Middle East have repeatedly told me that Ahmed Jibril was the true mastermind of Lockerbie. And so we find the 9/11 puzzle fits together exactly."

Susan claims that 'the 9/11 puzzle fits together exactly' and explains 'that's exactly what happened by the way'. Some how I don't feel as 'sure' about this information as Susan does. The further one reads the more this seems like more "Blame The Muslims For 9/11" hatred.

I'm going to remain open at this point but the extreme LIHOP references must be noted here. Susan is saying "The JIHADIS did 9/11 as a tribute to the greatest fighter against Israel who ever lived."

When Susan is asked if Iraq or Libya provided any pre-9/11 Intel, she says this:

"No, they did not. After the attack, it became clear that neither country could have been party to the conspiracy. Gadhaffi and bin Laden hated each other. Back in 1995, Libya was the first country in the world to warn Interpol about Osama, and urge an international warrant for his arrest. Saddam's government hated him, too. Baghdad considered Osama's extreme brand of Sunni fundamentalism to pose a serious destabilizing threat to Iraq 's moderate Sunni elite. Osama was a wrecking ball to Arab governments. They all despised him"

Again I have to point out the extreme LIHOP reference in this paragraph. She again suggest that Bin Laden is the source of the 9/11/2001 attacks. At this point I'm really concerned that this article is far to LHIOP to be taken seriously. But let's continue with an open mind. She eventually get's to the part where her CIA Handler apparently identifies Israeli Mossad agents.

Next Susan is asked who she warned of the impending Jihadi attack on NYC using Airplanes. She says:

"By early August, 2001, our team was gravely concerned that an attack was "imminent."

When Robert Mueller was nominated to be Director of the FBI, we dallied with going to his confirmation hearings to put a buzz in the ears of congressional staffers about our fears.

Instead, Dr. Fuisz instructed me to telephone U. S. Attorney General John Ashcroft's office.

In mid-August, I phoned the staff of his private office at the Justice Department, which probably consists of about 20 people. Identifying myself as an asset covering Libya and Iraq , I made a formal request that his private office issue an emergency alert throughout the department for any fragment of intelligence pertaining to possible airplane hijackings or airplane bombings. I explained that we expected a major attack involving that scenario, and we urgently needed cooperation from all other agencies.

Ashcroft's office told me to contact the Office of Counter-Terrorism at the Justice Department, and repeat what I had just told them. I did so immediately."

Susan claims that she contacted a few agencies with concerns that Jihadis were going to launch a tribute attack on the United States using Airplanes in NYC. But that's not all. When Collins asks her what happened after she warned the agencies, she says. "I didn't stop there". Enter 2nd-cousin Andy Card.

"I didn't stop there. Most Americans would be stunned to know that in mid-August, 2001, our team was so convinced a 9/11 style attack was imminent that I visited my second cousin, Andy Card at his house in Arlington, Virginia, so that we could warn him.

I parked on the street and waited in my car, chain smoking for almost two hours. Occasionally, I could see neighbors peering out of their windows. In my head, I rehearsed what I would tell the police if they showed up to investigate this strange car parked outside the house of the Chief of Staff to the President of the United States .

Unhappily, he did not return home, and I finally left without sharing our fears.

Driving away, I remember feeling that I was making the greatest mistake of my life. Throughout all these years, it is one of my few regrets."

This story sounds like disinformation to me.

First of all, if Andy is your second cousin then why would you need to sit in your car smoking like a nervous wreck? Why not just go knock on the door. Or better yet, call your second cousin and ask him if you can talk to him about an impending Jihadi attack that the CIA has informed you of? Or maybe just ask him to tea and inform him of the Jihadi attack once you meet with him.

I do not believe a CIA handled asset who conducts meetings with Libyan and Iraqi officials on anti-war and anti-terror matters can't find a way to meet with her 2nd cousin over an impending terrorist attack on the World Trade Center by Jihadis?

This story is bizarre and reminds me of the insane narrative presented by Sander Hicks called The Graham Report. With this bizarre Graham Report, Sander Hicks implies that Dr. Graham was killed because of his pre-9/11 intelligence that identified a few 9/11 hijackers. The intelligence that Graham had amounts to nothing more then a guy who saw Muslim names on cardboard boxes, or so he says. The Graham Report is beyond ridiculous and must be read in it's entirety to really get a feel for how badly this stuff is put together. One has to wonder "What the hell is Sander Hicks doing promoting obvious non sense like The Graham Report?"

Earlier in this interview Susan ends a paragraph with the statement below but does not come back to explain it until later. Here is the initial reference to her CIA Handler's source to information pertaining to impending Jihadi attacks on the WTC:

"...even before the 9/11 attack, I deduced that Dr. Fuisz's advance intelligence was derived from an entirely different source. It just happened to be one I had not expected."

I imagine you (my readers) are asking yourself the same question I'm asking myself. Who was the source? Well let's find out!

"Dr. Fuisz never formally revealed his source to me. But within about 30 minutes after airplanes struck the Twin Towers , he blurted something to me over the phone.

He told me the Israeli Mossad had advance warning about the attack. As I recall, he said it before the buildings collapsed.

He asked me if I thought it was "an accident that a man and woman happened to be waiting on the sidewalk with a video camera, ready to record the attack." He was highly agitated. He challenged me "how often a bystander has a camera cued up to record a car accident?"

Then he said, "Those are Israeli agents. It's not an accident. They knew this attack was coming. And they were waiting for it."

I was outraged and shocked by the images on the television. I shot back something to the effect of, "You mean, we've been looking for an attack all this time! And the Israelis knew about it? And they didn't tell us?" In retrospect, outside the passion of that particular moment, the Israelis may have told us much more than Richard Fuisz may have known.

Immediately the phone line cut dead between us.

I called him right back. Very calmly, he said, "Susan, we must never talk about that again."

There's a couple more details regarding this Mossad team with the video camera. Dr. Fuisz was able to announce their identities before the media publicized who they are. The attack was so new when he said it, that it seemed to me that he already knew about them.

I could be wrong. But I don't think so."

I know. I'm as disappointed as you are. The super-source that Jihadis were going to use planes to bomb the WTC is not really provided but might be implied. Yes, the Israeli Mossad was tracking the alleged 9/11 Hijackers and provided the US with all the evidence and information needed to identify the hijackers.

What I find most interesting is that Susan, a government and intelligence insider who is helping CIA, never once consider that maybe the Israelis knew about it because they helped plan the attack. Maybe the Israelis were invovled with the attacks Susan? Geez...this stuff just comes to me.

Does Michael Piper or Susan know that an alleged Israeli spy was arrested in Lebanon who just happens to be the Uncle of one of the fanatic Jihadis who allegedly hijacked 4 planes and crashed 2 of them into 2 skyscrapers and demolished 3 skyscrapers?

And at the end of the day, we want to know who wired the World Trade Center for demolition Susan. We know Jihadis were patsies. We know those 3 skyscrapers didn't come down because of the alleged 'hijackers'. You're going to have to do much better then this.

American Assasination Squad Strikes Again

2009-08-21T07:03:00.000-07:00

Image via Wikipedia

It seems like targeted assassinations and hit squads are all the rave these days. Not to long ago Seymour Hersh told us about Dick Cheney's alleged Executive Assassination Squad. Then, just the other day I read this story which says that the CIA contracted their hit squad duties out Black Water, a US company and mercenary provider. Blackwater USA now goes by the name of XE because of numerous murderous scandals involving the company, it's mercenary employees, and it's executives.

Also, the CEO and founder of the company was recently accused of...you guessed it... ordering hits on two Blackwater employees who were working with the feds to expose Blackwater and it's founder as murderous thugs on a crusade against Muslims. These accusations come from two anonymous ex-employees involved with a civil suit against Blackwater for murdering Iraqis.

Maybe the stories above are true. Maybe not. At the end of the day, Eric Prince of Blackwater is innocent until proven guilty of a crime. Cheney's hit squad is just an alleged hit squad. The CIA outsourcing of it's hit squad duties to Blackwater claims the plan never went operational.

But what about real assassination hit squads?

While we bicker about alleged hit-squads of the past, the United States government seems to be operating a real hit squad right now.

Last week The Real 9/11 Truth asked it's readers: Are you a fan of targeted assassinations? If you answered "yes, I love the idea of secret death squads taking out evil Muslims", then you probably were tickled to wake up this morning to the murder of 11 people in Pakistan.

The American Hit Squad is at it again.

US Assassination Squad Strikes Again (Friday August 12, 2009)
excerpt:

"The U.S. occasionally fired missiles into the region beginning in 2006, but dramatically stepped up the attacks last year.

The strikes have targeted militants behind surging attacks in Pakistan, those blamed for violence in Afghanistan, and Al Qaeda and other foreign terrorists allegedly using the area to plot or train for terrorist attacks around the world

Isn't that swell? The US is dropping bombs on villages of 'terrorists' in other countries. Apparently, this is acceptable to many Americans. Are most Americans fans of Assassination Hit Squads run by the government?

The Monstrous Lie Of 9/11/2001 Allows Americans To Overlook These Hit Squads Run By The US Government

Because Americans continue to deny that the 9/11/2001 attacks were blamed on Muslims, they are able to accept and silently endorse US run assassination squads that routinely take out so-called Muslim extremist.

Assassinations Are Wrong...Duh!

I never would have imagined that I'd be trying to convince my family and friends that government run assassination hit squads were wrong. But in this post-9/11 world it seems these things get overlooked. Muslims and Arabs have been dehumanized to the point that Americans are willing to accept that it's government operates assassination hit squads in foreign countries.

Stop Assassination Hit Sqauds By Considering 9/11 Truth

I don't believe that Americans support or embrace murderous assassination hit squads. I don't believe that Americans are racist towards Muslims and Arabs.

Don't Be Afraid Of Ridicule

Image via Wikipedia

I believe that Americans are afraid to even discuss the fact that Muslims and Arabs were blamed for the 9/11/2001 attacks. Americans are afraid of being labeled a 'conspiracy theorist' or a 'nut case'. The risk of ridicule seems to be to great and so we just sit back and allow our government to do things like operate assassination hit squads.

It's time to consider the real truth about 9/11/2001. It's time for all people to incorporate 9/11 Truth into your daily diet of news, discussion and activism.

It's time to stop blaming Muslims and Arabs for 9/11 and stop the hit squads.

Are you a fan of targeted assassinations?

2009-08-05T14:15:00.000-07:00

America, friends and family: it's time to consider 9/11 Truth. It's time to stop blaming Muslims. It's time to stop turning a blind eye on a monstrous lie that has lead us down a very dark path and continues because we allow it to continue.

Are you a fan of things like targeted assassinations and mass killings in the name of 9/11/2001?

The exaggerated threat of Islamic Extremism has been used to destroy hundreds of thousands of lives in wars that we all know were illegal and absolute crimes against humanity. Considering 9/11 Truth RIGHT NOW, with all it's ramifications and life changing realizations, is the only way to stop this bizarre madness that has taken a grip on this country.

Consider this...

Today the wife of a "Taliban chief" in Pakistan was murdered by another apparent US drone missile strike. No trial, no judge and no jury. Just silence, an un-manned aerial drone floating overhead...and mom and 4 kids maybe watching some TV.

Here's a link to the story
http://www.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/08/05/pakistan.drone.attack/index.html

Place yourself in this mother's shoes. Or maybe you're a father? Imagine you're going about your daily activities just before the assassination bombing commenced. Are you there? Can you see how incredibly insane this situation has become?

I don't know about you but I find targeted assassinations very disturbing. And at the end of the day it is the attacks on 9/11/2001 and the lie about Muslim responsibility that have allowed these types of assassinations to take place. They will continue unless this country demands 9/11 Truth.

This is a call to action. Get involved. I have no idea what you need to do to get involved. That's up to you. But PLEASE...at the very least...start with this:

STOP SPREADING THE LIE THAT ISLAMIC EXTREMISM WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE ATTACKS ON 9/11/2001. COMBAT THIS LIE WHEREVER AND WHENEVER IT REARS IT'S HEAD.

This is it. If 9/11 Truth does not take hold then I'm afraid hundreds of thousands may die because of this lie and history will not look back kindly on us. We can fix this.

Revisting Some Israeli Links To 9/11

2009-08-02T17:51:00.000-07:00

Much time has been spent by the criminal US Government to blame the attacks on 9/11/2001 on this exaggerated threat of 'Extremist Islam'. Like wise, the fake 9/11 Truth Movement seems just as hell bent on re-enforcing this and rabidly blaming fanatical "Muslims" for the attacks on 9/11. With spotty evidence to support the case, both of these camps ignore or downplay potentially ground-breaking information that could point to the true criminals that planned and executed the attacks on 9/11/2001.

This is dangerous policy. It's dangerous to 9/11 Truth, dangerous to Muslims, dangerous anti-war activists...for everyone.

As much as I'd like to believe in the simplistic "Fanatical Islamic Hijackers With Box Cutters" theory...it doesn't cut it. Someone literally wired 3 buildings for demolition and carried out the operation on 9/11/2001. When we consider that three buildings were wired and then demolished on 9/11/2001, the hijackers aka 'Islamic Fanatics With Box Cutters Theory' can be seen for what it is, a distraction. This theme was created to deliberately shift away focus from the true criminals behind the 9/11/2001 attacks.

Patsies. It's not a new concept. Commit a crime and blame it on someone else.

But websites like www.911Blogger.com and other 911 Truth sites seem hell bent on helping the US Government re-enforce this dangerous conspiracy theory about fanatical Muslim Hijackers. At the same time, both camps seem to totally ignore or down play absolutely spectacular leads that point to a state sponsor of the attacks on 9/11/2001.

So, considering how patsies are used to shift blame, lets forget those evil Muslim hijackers for a minute. Lets assume a state was responsible for the events on 9/11 and it wasn't the work of Extremist Islam.

Is there any evidence to suggest the 9/11 attacks were sponsored by a specific state? Pakistan? Iran? Iraq? Israel?

We've heard the case against Pakistan. Jon Gold at www.911Blogger.com routinely presents the case against Pakistan. IMO, there is no case against Pakistan and Jon Gold has failed to produce any verifiable or credible evidence to support the theory that the Pakistani General of the ISI wired these alleged hijackers money. Even if Gold was able to confirm this, there is still a huge hurdle which is showing how the money was used to wire the wtc complex...errrr...i mean hijack planes with box cutters.

Below I've compiled some excerpts from news articles that give the impression that Israel had a network of spies working within the United States on and before 9/11. In short, on 9/11 5 Israelis were arrested in NJ while watching the towers burn. Some of these were allegedly members of the Israeli military. There is also the peculiar case of Ali Jarrah, the cousin of one of the alleged 9/11 hijackers, Ziad Jarrah. Ali Jarrah was arrested in Lebanon in 2008 and is now awaiting trial for allegedly spying on Lebanon for Israel.

As you read these few segments and consider the implications, you should also remember how conveniently the evidence against 'Muslims' was in place on 9/11/2001. Remember how Arabic flight manuals were conviently found in a rental car?

Is the case against Israel a case of planted evidence? Maybe, just like Muslims were blamed, someone is trying to blame Israel for the attacks on 9/11/2001? It seems just a little hard to believe that 5 Israeli spies would decide to dress up as Arabs on 9/11, set up a video camera, and start celebrating in the street next to the towers. But apparently they did.

The Israelis Arrested And Detained On 9/11/2001
The Sunday Herold 2003

"Five Israelis were seen filming as jet liners ploughed into the Twin Towers on September 11, 2001 ..."

"As the World Trade Centre burned and crumpled, the five men celebrated and filmed the worst atrocity ever committed on American soil as it played out before their eyes."

"They were Israelis - and at least two of them were Israeli intelligence agents, working for Mossad, the equivalent of MI6 or the CIA."

"They seemed to be taking a movie. They were like happy, you know ... they didn't look shocked to me. I thought it was strange."

"Paul Kurzberg refused to take a lie detector test for 10 weeks, but then failed it. His lawyer said he was reluctant to take the test as he had once worked for Israeli intelligence in another country."

"...there is more than a little circumstantial evidence to show that Mossad - whose motto is "By way of deception, thou shalt do war" - was spying on Arab extremists in the USA and may have known that September 11 was in the offing, yet decided to withhold vital information from their American counterparts which could have prevented the terror attacks."

"Certainly, it seems, Israel was spying within the borders of the United States and it is equally certain that the targets were Islamic extremists probably linked to September 11."

Israeli Spy Brothers Arrested In Lebanon - 2/18/2009
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/02/19/world/middleeast/19lebanon.html?scp=1&...

"Mr. Jarrah’s arrest has shed a rare light onto a world of spying and subversion that usually persists in secret."

"To friends and neighbors, he was an earnest supporter of the Palestinian cause, an affable, white-haired family man who worked as an administrator at a nearby school."

"To Israel, he appears to have been a valued spy, sending reports and taking clandestine photographs of Palestinian groups and Hezbollah since 1983"

"...along with his brother Yusuf, who is accused of helping him spy — and he awaits trial by a military court"

"Mr. Jarrah has said he was recruited in 1983 — a year after Israel began a major invasion of Lebanon — by Israeli officers who had imprisoned him, according to investigators."

"It is not the family’s first brush with notoriety. One of Mr. Jarrah’s cousins, Ziad al-Jarrah, was among the 19 hijackers who carried out the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, though the men were 20 years apart in age and do not appear to have known each other well."

Israeli Spy Brothers Cousin Was An Alleged 9/11 Terrorist Pilot
WIKI: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ziad_Jarrah

"When he was seven years old, Israel invaded southern Lebanon, a fact he referred to later in life"

"In late 1999, Jarrah, Mohamed Atta, Marwan al-Shehhi, Said Bahaji, and Ramzi Binalshibh decided to travel to Chechnya to fight Russian soldiers. Khalid al-Masri and Mohamedou Ould Slahi convinced them at the last minute to travel instead to Afghanistan to meet with Osama bin Laden and train for terrorist attacks. They were told they were on a highly secret mission, and were instructed to return to Germany and enroll in flight school. In October 1999, Ziad Jarrah was filmed at Said Bahaji’s wedding with other 9/11 hijackers, including Marwan al-Shehhi."

"Jarrah reported his passport stolen in February 2000 and received a duplicate, just as hijackers Atta and al-Shehhi had done the previous month."

"He then traveled to Florida, where he enrolled full-time at the Florida Flight Training Center in Venice."

"A month after the hijackings, U.S. authorities also discovered a letter written by Jarrah to his girlfriend in Germany and postmarked September 10. In the letter -- which was mistakenly addressed and returned to the United States, where authorities found it -- Jarrah told his girlfriend he had done his duty.

Israeli Spy Ring Tracking Alleged 9/11 Terrorists
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/2294487.stm
Wednesday, 2 October, 2002

"The paper has uncovered details of a major Israeli spy ring involving some a 120 agents for the intelligence service Mossad operating across America and some masquerading as arts students.

"The ring was reportedly hard on the heels of at least four members of the hijack gang, including its leader Mohammed Atta"

"the Israeli agents were detected by their American counterparts and thrown out of the country, it says.

The US authorities said then that they were students whose visas had expired"

"Just a month before the deadly attacks, the paper said, Mossad handed over to the Americans a detailed report naming several suspects they believe were preparing an attack on the United States.

But it contained no specific indications as to the objective and it was not treated seriously."

Foreign Intelligence Agency Involved In 9/11

http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2001/10/08/011008fa_FACT

"A senior military officer told me that because of the visas and other documentation needed to infiltrate team members into the United States a major foreign intelligence service might also have been involved."

"Many of the investigators believe that some of the initial clues that were uncovered about the terrorists’ identities and preparations, such as flight manuals, were meant to be found. A former high-level intelligence official told me, “Whatever trail was left was left deliberately—for the F.B.I. to chase.”

Israeli Military Officials Arrested/Detained In The USA After 9/11 Attacks (2001/2002)
In November, 2001, Fox News aired this four part series. Tthey said 60 Israeli spies were arrested in connection with the 9/11 attack.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JWpWc_suPWo
Fox News - 4 part series on Massive Israeli Spy Ring

"Since September 11 over 60 Israelis have been either arrested or detained"

"A handful of active Israeli military were among those detained"

"Some of the detainees also failed polygraph"

"...event prior to September 11 over 140 other Israelis had been detained or arrested

"...they may have gathered information about the attacks and not shared it"
"Evidence linking these Israelis to 9/11 is classified. I can not tell you about evidence that has been gathered. It is classified information"

Israeli Spies Helped Thwart 911 Investigation?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KhAEjSQghj8&feature=related
2001/2002

"...an Israeli based private communications company for whom a half dozen of those 60 detained suspects worked....

"information from this firm may have fallen in the wrong hands and had the affect of impeding the September 11th terror inquiries.

"...some American terrororism investigators fear certain suspects in the September 11 attacks may have manage to stay ahead of them by knowing who and when investigators were calling on the telephone"

Israeli Sayeret Matkal Officer Killed On 9/11/2009 On Flight 11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Daniel_M._Lewin
9/11/2001

"Lewin was born in Denver, Colorado and raised in Jerusalem. He served for four years in the Israel Defence Forces as an officer in Sayeret Matkal, an elite and secretive unit."

"According to the FAA, Lewin was seated in business class in seat 9B, close to hijackers Mohammed Atta and Satam al Suqami (who was possibly seated behind him)."

(Sayeret_Matkal - Secret Israeli Military Unit
"Members of the unit were trained by Bedouin trackers on the finer points of looking and thinking like an Arab."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sayeret_Matkal

Did Israel Help

2009-07-21T06:38:00.001-07:00